Biomechanics and Medicine in Swimming XI
Biomechanics and Medicine in Swimming XI
Biomechanics and Medicine in Swimming XI
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
are given. The featured particularity of girls <strong>in</strong> comparison with boys is a higher<br />
parameter of sport achievement level. At the same time they do not differ on age,<br />
parameters of biological maturity <strong>and</strong> swimm<strong>in</strong>g career duration. As well, girls come<br />
short on morpho-functional parameters <strong>and</strong> especially on <strong>in</strong>tegrated characteristics of<br />
capacity <strong>and</strong> efficiency of the aerobic mechanism of power supply, compared with<br />
boys. However the ECG analysis of girls before the test was identical to the boys, but<br />
girls had higher parameters of cardiovascular system adaptation after test<strong>in</strong>g to the po<strong>in</strong>t<br />
of exhaustion (<strong>in</strong> a flume). We want to emphasize that at a later stage, none of the<br />
female swimmers from this class reached the level of elite competition.<br />
Table 5. Mean values of parameters <strong>in</strong> classes of the strongest swimmers<br />
at the age of 14 years (M <strong>and</strong> SD)<br />
Table 5. Mean values of parameters <strong>in</strong> classes of the strongest swimmers at the age of<br />
14 years (M <strong>and</strong> SD)<br />
Parameters<br />
Classes<br />
Girls, n = 21 Boys, n = 22<br />
Qualification, nom<strong>in</strong>al units 4.21 ± 0.55 3.38 ± 0.99<br />
CA, months 167.05 ± 3.11 168.71 ± 3.09<br />
ВA, po<strong>in</strong>ts 4.99 * ± 0.79 4.94 ± 1.01<br />
CA– ВA, years -0.37 ± 0.53 0.82 ± 0.99<br />
Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g experience, years 6.07 ± 0.73 6.00 ± 1.15<br />
Height, сm 166.94 ± 5.72 174.97 ± 7.53<br />
Weight, kg 55.56 ± 5.20 61.68 ± 7.42<br />
Chest circumference, сm 83.67 ± 3.21 90.10 ± 3.67<br />
Biceps circumference, сm 24.86 ± 1.73 26.69 ± 1.78<br />
H<strong>and</strong> strength, kg 28.95 ± 4.34 42.48 ± 6.38<br />
Lung Capacity, l 3.58 ± 0.42 5.07 ± 0.74<br />
Bone mass, kg 9.88 ± 0.91 12.84 ± 1.50<br />
Muscle mass, kg 24.37 ± 2.68 30.25 ± 4.21<br />
Fat mass, kg 10.16 ± 2.18 8.37 ± 1.84<br />
Brachium-pelvic <strong>in</strong>dex 1.39 ± 0.10 1.45 ± 0.08<br />
VO2 max, l / m 2.98 ± 0.59 4.61 ± 0.46<br />
LV, l 92.84 ± 22.72 117.44 ± 18.16<br />
O2P, ml /beats/m<strong>in</strong> 16.23 ± 3.76 25.40 ± 3.15<br />
ECG before load, n.u. 4.67 ± 0.56 4.65 ± 0.53<br />
<strong>Biomechanics</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Medic<strong>in</strong>e</strong> <strong>in</strong> Swimm<strong>in</strong>g <strong>XI</strong><br />
84<br />
Chapter * 5 Biological Education, age Advice <strong>in</strong> girls <strong>and</strong> Biofeedback = 5 po<strong>in</strong>ts correspond<strong>in</strong>g to the first menses age.<br />
ECG after In load, table n.u. 6 the different ways 4.89 of categoriz<strong>in</strong>g ± 0.29 the 4.43 athletes ± 0.83 are presented.<br />
* Biological Among age <strong>in</strong> representatives girls = 5 po<strong>in</strong>ts correspond<strong>in</strong>g of these classes to the there first menses are swimmers age. who per-<br />
In table formed 6 the different at a later ways date of as national categoriz<strong>in</strong>g swimm<strong>in</strong>g the athletes team are members presented. at Among the <strong>in</strong>-<br />
representatives ternational of these level. classes Parameter there are comparison swimmers who testifies performed that at the a later Class date of as 11<br />
national girls-swimmers swimm<strong>in</strong>g team generally members at do the not <strong>in</strong>ternational differ from level. the Parameter above class comparison analysis<br />
testifies that the Сlass of 11 girls-swimmers generally do not differ from the above class<br />
analysis concern<strong>in</strong>g concern<strong>in</strong>g chronologic chronologic <strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> biological biological age. Nevertheless, age. Nevertheless, they have they greater have<br />
body height greater <strong>and</strong> body also height more athletic <strong>and</strong> also constitution more athletic characteristics. constitution However, characteristics. the most<br />
important However, difference the for most them (from important a class difference of girls <strong>in</strong> table for them 5) is that (from they a already class of at girls the<br />
age of 14 years had more appreciably dimension of physiological characteristics (VO2<br />
<strong>in</strong> table 5) is that they already at the age of 14 years had more appre-<br />
max; O2P; LV, etc.). Boys of a class n=16 also have greater height <strong>and</strong> are biologically<br />
more mature. ciably At dimension the same time of physiological on body proportions characteristics they have a (VO less 2 strong-build max; O2P; <strong>and</strong> LV,<br />
less relative etc.). subcutaneous Boys of a class fat. n=16 also have greater height <strong>and</strong> are biologically<br />
more mature. At the same time on body proportions they have a less<br />
Table 6. Mean values of analysed parameters <strong>in</strong> classes of 14 years swimmers of<br />
vary<strong>in</strong>g strong-build characteristics <strong>and</strong> (M <strong>and</strong> less SD) relative subcutaneous fat.<br />
Parameters Classes<br />
Girls, n = 11 Boys, n = 16<br />
Qualification, nom<strong>in</strong>al units 4.18 ± 0.39 3.68 ± 0.41<br />
CA, months 167.91 ± 2.58 168.01 ± 1.98<br />
BA, po<strong>in</strong>ts 4.89 ± 0.93 5.44 ± 1.31<br />
CA – BA, years - 0.42 ± 0.61 1.02 ± 0.79<br />
Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Experience, years 5.64 ± 0.98 5.77 ± 1.15<br />
Height, cm 170.50 ± 3.30 180.94 ± 4.39<br />
Weight, kg 56.03 ± 4.64 66.89 ± 4.99<br />
Chest circumference, сm 85.91 ± 4.30 92.50 ± 2.44<br />
Biceps circumference, сm 25.06 ± 1.53 27.46 ± 1.84<br />
H<strong>and</strong> strength, kg 28.95 ± 6.41 43.31 ± 7.18<br />
Lung Capacity, l 3.77 ± 0.46 5.69 ± 0.24<br />
Bone mass, kg 9.88 ± 0.91 13.81 ± 0.95<br />
Muscle mass, kg 25.83 ± 3.32 33.29 ± 3.23<br />
Fat mass, kg 10.61 ± 2.52 8.57 ± 1.80<br />
Brachium-pelvic <strong>in</strong>dex, n.u. 1.38 ± 0.08 1.41 ± 0.08<br />
VO2 max, l / m 3.79 ± 0.32 ⎯<br />
LV, l 102.43 ± 27.35 ⎯<br />
O2P, ml /beats/m<strong>in</strong> 20.85 ± 2.76 ⎯<br />
DISCUSSION Table 6. Mean values of analysed parameters <strong>in</strong> classes of 14 years swim-<br />
The analysis carried out reveals a complex process of the best performers chang<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />
their development mers of vary<strong>in</strong>g while characteristics <strong>in</strong> junior swimm<strong>in</strong>g. (M <strong>and</strong> The SD) f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs show that swimmers of<br />
different characteristics at the age of 13-14 years can achieve success <strong>in</strong> this sport.<br />
Among girls, swimmers ga<strong>in</strong> advantage over others, through optimum body<br />
parameters <strong>and</strong> excellent adaptation possibilities of their cardiovascular system. It<br />
dIscussIon<br />
allows them to start <strong>in</strong>tensive tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g early which does not lead to the necessary<br />
development The analysis of the carried aerobic out power reveals supply a complex mechanisms. process In of a the quantitative best performers sense<br />
chang<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> their development while <strong>in</strong> junior swimm<strong>in</strong>g. The f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
show that swimmers of different characteristics at the age of 13-14 years<br />
can achieve success <strong>in</strong> this sport.<br />
Among girls, swimmers ga<strong>in</strong> advantage over others, through optimum<br />
body parameters <strong>and</strong> excellent adaptation possibilities of their car-<br />
chaPter5.education,advice<strong>and</strong>BiofeedBack<br />
diovascular system. It allows them to start <strong>in</strong>tensive tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g early which<br />
does not lead to the necessary development of the aerobic power supply<br />
mechanisms. In a quantitative sense <strong>in</strong>dependently of the different<br />
age-groups <strong>and</strong> generations the girls with retardation of biological maturity<br />
prevailed. Due to peculiarities of their body type <strong>and</strong> biological<br />
development they are <strong>in</strong>cl<strong>in</strong>ed to swim <strong>in</strong> tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g regimes at a more<br />
moderate speed. That helps to boost aerobic capability.(tab.5). There is a<br />
further explanation of the preference of select<strong>in</strong>g swimmers with a body<br />
weight deficit <strong>and</strong> a retardation of puberty signs <strong>in</strong> girls. Only at the age<br />
of 16-17 years the tendency to prevalence of a somatotype accord<strong>in</strong>g to<br />
requirements of modern sports is observed. However the representation<br />
of swimmers <strong>in</strong> these age categories is already at a m<strong>in</strong>imum.<br />
The 12 years of <strong>in</strong>vestigation of the same high level swimmers have<br />
revealed a decrease <strong>in</strong> a selection tendency of swimmers with <strong>in</strong>adequate<br />
typology of age-related development for sports aim<strong>in</strong>g at high level<br />
achievement. The change <strong>in</strong> selection trends occurred aga<strong>in</strong>st an age<br />
<strong>in</strong>crease of swimmers of the reserves of the country national team. Accord<strong>in</strong>gly,<br />
we have observed a growth of the number of swimmers with<br />
optimum body parameters concern<strong>in</strong>g requirements for this particular<br />
sport.<br />
Table 6 shows that girls who moved forward at a later age <strong>in</strong> their<br />
sport results did not differ from the strongest swimmers at the age of 14<br />
years. But features of their physical development (tallness, body weight<br />
deficit) did not allow cop<strong>in</strong>g with high <strong>in</strong>tensity tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g loads. Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong> more optimal regimes was reflected <strong>in</strong> an advantage <strong>in</strong> aerobic<br />
development possibilities. Thus, research has confirmed the necessity of<br />
account<strong>in</strong>g for age development features <strong>and</strong> the orientation of tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
for peak achievements at a later age.<br />
conclusIons<br />
The competitive activity success at a juvenile age is def<strong>in</strong>ed often<br />
by a choice of the sports preparation strategy <strong>and</strong> the <strong>in</strong>fluence<br />
of swimmer phenotype, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g features of biological development.<br />
At the age of decisive hormonal shifts (13-14 years) athletes<br />
with a certa<strong>in</strong> typology have the advantage. They co<strong>in</strong>cide<br />
with the age norm regard<strong>in</strong>g the pace of puberty <strong>and</strong> possess<br />
high adaptive capacities of the cardiovascular system. However,<br />
their ability to endure a high <strong>in</strong>tensity tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g load is negatively reflected<br />
<strong>in</strong> their aerobic development possibilities. Such a situation<br />
further affects the dynamics of sport achievement growth. Features of<br />
athlete physical development, particularly growth <strong>in</strong> body height connected<br />
with asthenisation does not at this age allow tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g at high<br />
<strong>in</strong>tensity. Accord<strong>in</strong>gly, these swimmers reach their best results at<br />
a later age. Their advantage <strong>in</strong> the development of aerobic power<br />
supply mechanisms also promotes this. Therefore, this provides<br />
them with the best adaptation to tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g at higher <strong>in</strong>tensity at a<br />
more mature age. These revealed tendencies are more precisely shown<br />
<strong>in</strong> the comparative analysis of the high level young swimmers’ data of<br />
different generations.<br />
reFerences<br />
Brettschneider, W.D. (2001) Involvement of organized sports <strong>and</strong> adolescent<br />
development. In: Book of Abstracts, 6-th Annual Congress of the<br />
European College of Sport Science: ”Perspectives <strong>and</strong> Profiles”. Cologne,<br />
July 24-28, 2001. p. 16<br />
Bulgakova, N.Z. & I.V. Tchebotareva (1999). Analysis of the concepts<br />
<strong>and</strong> the effectiveness of prepar<strong>in</strong>g the sports reserve <strong>in</strong> swimm<strong>in</strong>g for<br />
the period of seventies – n<strong>in</strong>eties. In: “Wychowanie Fizyczne i Sport”.<br />
Proceed<strong>in</strong>g of the 3 rd International Scientific Congress on Modern Olympic<br />
Sport, vol. XLIII, Warszawa, p. 77-78.<br />
Klyuchnikova, M.V. (2000). Ispolzovanie kriteriev biologicheskogo razvitiya<br />
v upravlenii podgotovkoi yunykh sportsmenov (na primere sportivnogo<br />
plavaniya) [The use of biological development criteria <strong>in</strong> management of<br />
young sportsmen preparation (at example of competitive swimm<strong>in</strong>g)].<br />
Ph.D. Thesis <strong>in</strong> Educational Science: Moscow, VNIIFK, 170 p<br />
345