12.07.2015 Views

Energy Systems and Technologies for the Coming Century ...

Energy Systems and Technologies for the Coming Century ...

Energy Systems and Technologies for the Coming Century ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The role of biomass <strong>and</strong> CCS in China in aclimate mitigation perspectiveMikael Lüthje, Kenneth Karlsson, Jay Gregg, Tullik Helene Ystanes Føyn, <strong>and</strong> Olex<strong>and</strong>rBalyk. All authors are affiliated with Risø DTU, Denmark.AbstractAs <strong>the</strong> world’s largest emitter of greenhouse gasses (GHGs), China plays a central rolein <strong>the</strong> suite of options <strong>for</strong> climate change mitigation. To analyze <strong>the</strong> importance ofbiomass <strong>and</strong> carbon capture <strong>and</strong> storage (CCS) availability in China, varying levels of<strong>the</strong>se parameters are created <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>n global climate scenarios are simulated using TIAM(TIMES Integrated Assessment Model). TIAM is a 16-region global energy systemoptimization model that includes a climate module that calculates <strong>the</strong> globalconcentrations of GHGs in <strong>the</strong> atmosphere.We analyze <strong>the</strong> potential <strong>for</strong> using biomass, CCS, <strong>and</strong> bioenergy CCS (BECCS) in Chinaunder <strong>the</strong> constraint of meeting a climate stabilization target such that dangerous climatechange (as defined by <strong>the</strong> Copenhagen Accord) is avoided. When consideringhypo<strong>the</strong>tical scenarios where GHG emissions are constrained, China consumes allavailable domestic biomass as a relatively inexpensive fuel source. However, whileBECCS does have a small role to play, in general it is cheaper to use biomass <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong>transportation sector <strong>and</strong> CCS with fossil fuel in order to meet both <strong>the</strong> energy dem<strong>and</strong><strong>and</strong> emissions reduction goals in <strong>the</strong> cheapest way possible.There<strong>for</strong>e, we find that while both utilization of biomass <strong>and</strong> CCS are essential options<strong>for</strong> reducing emissions in China, BECCS is not <strong>the</strong> most cost effective option in China.CCS is never<strong>the</strong>less an important option <strong>for</strong> China; in <strong>the</strong> climate mitigation scenariosmodeled, by 2050, China is projected to employ CCS on at least 70% of fossil energyelectricity generation. When CCS is excluded, <strong>the</strong> cost of mitigation is more th<strong>and</strong>oubled compared to <strong>the</strong> scenarios where CCS is included as a mitigation option.1. IntroductionReducing <strong>the</strong> risk of dangerous climate change, defined as an increase in <strong>the</strong> global meantemperature of 2°C (with <strong>the</strong> CO 2 concentration not exceeding 443 ppm), will require anambitious ef<strong>for</strong>t to reduce net greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Participation fromChina is crucially important if we are to achieve this goal. First, China accounts <strong>for</strong> asubstantial share of <strong>the</strong> world’s population, economy, <strong>and</strong> GHG emissions: China has <strong>the</strong>world’s largest population <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> second largest economy, <strong>and</strong> has recently become <strong>the</strong>world leader in GHG emissions (Gregg et al., 2008). Second, China’s Gross DomesticProduct (GDP), energy consumption <strong>and</strong> GHG emissions are expected to continue toincrease rapidly in <strong>the</strong> coming years (Blan<strong>for</strong>d et al. 2008), <strong>and</strong> this rapid growth inemissions could offset mitigation ef<strong>for</strong>ts in o<strong>the</strong>r parts of <strong>the</strong> world, e.g. Annex-I(industrialized) countries (Blan<strong>for</strong>d et al. 2008). Third, because of <strong>the</strong> speed with whichChina’s energy dem<strong>and</strong> is growing, <strong>the</strong> country is facing a large challenge in exp<strong>and</strong>ingsupply rapidly enough. Domestic coal is currently <strong>the</strong> most used <strong>and</strong> most readilyavailable energy supply source (BP, 2010 <strong>and</strong> International <strong>Energy</strong> Agency, 2008), but itis a carbon-intensive fuel. There<strong>for</strong>e, aligning <strong>the</strong> security of supply requirements wi<strong>the</strong>nvironmental <strong>and</strong> climate change objectives is a great challenge <strong>for</strong> China (Zeng et al.2008). Finally, global mitigation costs increase significantly when action is delayed innon-Annex I countries, including China (Clarke et al. 2009). Current Chinese ef<strong>for</strong>ts tocombat climate change will <strong>the</strong>re<strong>for</strong>e be of high importance; avoiding dangerous levels1Risø International <strong>Energy</strong> Conference 2011 Proceedings Page 258

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!