12.07.2015 Views

Energy Systems and Technologies for the Coming Century ...

Energy Systems and Technologies for the Coming Century ...

Energy Systems and Technologies for the Coming Century ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

IntroductionElectricity has become a part of <strong>the</strong> modern civilization <strong>and</strong> is <strong>the</strong> most common <strong>for</strong>m ofenergy in use because of its cleanliness, simplicity <strong>and</strong> its versatility in uses. Despite ofcentury long history of <strong>the</strong> grid electrification, still large population in <strong>the</strong> developingworld are living ei<strong>the</strong>r in dark or with alternative arrangement <strong>for</strong> lighting. In most of <strong>the</strong>developing countries, electricity market is characterized by low access rate <strong>and</strong> low loadfactors (Haanyika, 2008; Mainali <strong>and</strong> Silveira, 2010). Rural areas in many developingcountries are thinly populated <strong>and</strong> geographically isolated, which means difficultaccessibility. This increases <strong>the</strong> unit cost of electricity delivery (Ashok, 2007; Banerjee,2006). Even <strong>the</strong> access areas are of poor supply quality with huge gap between supply<strong>and</strong> dem<strong>and</strong>, followed by load-shedding, frequent blackouts <strong>and</strong> high transmission losses.The rural electrification in many developing countries has been implemented on politicalinterest <strong>and</strong> without <strong>the</strong> real resource assessment (looking at <strong>the</strong> cost of electricitygeneration with different alternatives). The off-grid <strong>and</strong> on-grid options are oftenpromoted in parallel, many times responding to opportunities generated throughinternational action <strong>and</strong> donors’ programs objectives. Thus, <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>for</strong> choosingpathways in electrification is not often clear or rational.Various literatures are available on <strong>the</strong> discussion about off-grid technologies withsystem design, policies <strong>and</strong> programmes, <strong>and</strong> economic analysis (Martinot et al., 2001;Arun et al., 2007; Chaurey <strong>and</strong> K<strong>and</strong>pal, 2010; Kumar <strong>and</strong> Banerjee, 2010; Brent <strong>and</strong>Rogers, 2010). Nguyen (2007) examined <strong>the</strong> economic feasibility of two off-gridtechnologies i.e. solar PV <strong>and</strong> wind power in <strong>the</strong> context of rural Vietnam, looking at<strong>the</strong>ir levelized cost of generation. Thiam. (2010) has analyzed alternative pathways (offgridtechnologies versus on-grid) in <strong>the</strong> context of Senegal by adopting similarmethodology as of Nguyen (2007) with additional consideration of environmentalexternalities. Some o<strong>the</strong>r literatures are also available on off-grid technologies with minigrid systems <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> grid connection (Wamukonya <strong>and</strong> Davis, 2001; Oparaku, 2003;Nfah et al., 2008; Kirubi et al., 2009; Kumar et al., 2009).This paper basically follows <strong>the</strong> same methodology as followed by Nguyen (2007) <strong>and</strong>Thiam. (2010) <strong>and</strong> looks at <strong>the</strong> various alternative pathways <strong>for</strong> rural electrification inAfghanistan <strong>and</strong> Nepal. The paper analyses rural electrification scenarios with (a) variousrenewable energy (RE) technologies of individual household system, (b) using mini gridswith micro hydro, <strong>and</strong> (c) also <strong>the</strong> case when <strong>the</strong> national grid connection reaches in anarea which is previously supplied with off-grid technologies. Levelized cost of electricity(LCOE) has been taken as <strong>the</strong> main basis to compare various options. Three referencetechnologies Solar PV system, Micro hydro <strong>and</strong> Wind generators are chosen <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong>analysis. The study has chosen <strong>the</strong> two countries Afghanistan <strong>and</strong> Nepal, due to somesimilar characteristics such as both of <strong>the</strong>se countries are l<strong>and</strong>locked, <strong>and</strong> economicallyamong <strong>the</strong> poorest countries in <strong>the</strong> world, <strong>and</strong> politically both have passed through a longhistory of conflict <strong>and</strong> insurgency. Similarly from <strong>the</strong> resource perspectives, both <strong>the</strong>countries have similar average solar intensity in <strong>the</strong> range of 200 w/m 2 , <strong>and</strong> both havehilly terrain areas having huge potential <strong>for</strong> micro <strong>and</strong> small hydro powers <strong>for</strong> ruralelectrification. Wind potential has not been harnessed in both <strong>the</strong> cases, but could beexplored in future. In <strong>the</strong> case of Nepal, ef<strong>for</strong>ts have been made to collect <strong>the</strong> data onRisø International <strong>Energy</strong> Conference 2011 Proceedings Page 358

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!