13.12.2012 Views

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Star Streak Tutorial<br />

The actual _area_ <strong>of</strong> the lens is the determining factor.<br />

Thus a 200/4 has as much light-gathering area as a 50mm f1.0 !<br />

So, I had problems recording good star trails on a 45mm f4.0; no wonder !<br />

this has only a 11.25mm effective aperture... that 200f4 has a 50mm aperture !<br />

thus, a shorter lens will need to be faster, or use faster film.<br />

Bear<br />

-- Barry Rowland, April 29, 1997<br />

You recommend a manual camera, because <strong>of</strong> battery consumtion and this is true for most <strong>of</strong> the modern<br />

cameras, but the old Canon EOS cameras (600-series) feature a mechanical lock <strong>of</strong> the shutter and draw<br />

nearly no current (25 microamps, this means a fresh 2CR5 battery will last for 50.000 houres ...)<br />

-- Helmut Faugel, June 17, 1997<br />

Concerning astrophotography and the recording <strong>of</strong> stars, there seems to be some confusion about fratios,<br />

aperture, focal lengths, etc. For point sources such as stars, it is the focal length, not the physical<br />

aperture, that determines the limits <strong>of</strong> what will be recorded on film. This is because the amount <strong>of</strong><br />

background sky included in the picture varies with focal length and thus the amount <strong>of</strong> magnitudelimiting<br />

sky fog goes up as the focal length decreases. Longer lenses include less <strong>of</strong> the sky and<br />

therefore less <strong>of</strong> the sky fog. Since the stars are points, their light is not spread out as focal length<br />

(magnification) increases. This effect results in an increase in the ratio <strong>of</strong> starlight (point source) to<br />

skylight (non-point source) as focal length increases, and fainter stars are recorded before being limited<br />

by the sky fog. This light-source ratio is not affected by the f-ratio or physical aperture <strong>of</strong> the lens. For<br />

example, a 50mm lens at a dark site has a limiting photographic magnitude <strong>of</strong> about 11.5. A 500mm lens<br />

has a limiting magnitude <strong>of</strong> about 16. The magnitude scale is a way <strong>of</strong> estimating the brightness <strong>of</strong> an<br />

object, with each successive magnitude number being about 2.5 times brighter than the next one<br />

(magnitude 1 is 2.5X brighter than magnitude 2). The f-ratio does determine how fast the sky fog limit is<br />

reached. Exposures longer than that needed to reach the sky fog limit will not record fainter stars.<br />

For star trails, you should pick an f-ratio that will give you a decent star exposure for the faintest stars<br />

you want to record. For a given exposure time, too low a ratio will cause a fast sky fog build up with<br />

little contrast between stars and sky. Too high an f-ratio will result in fewer stars against a darker<br />

background. The f-ratio you choose will depend on the local sky conditions and the focal length <strong>of</strong> the<br />

lens for the reasons stated above.<br />

In visual astronomy, the physical aperture determines the limiting magnitudes <strong>of</strong> stars. At the same<br />

http://www.photo.net/astro/star-streak (3 <strong>of</strong> 9)7/3/2005 2:15:29 AM

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!