13.12.2012 Views

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Light<br />

sticking a small diffuser over the light, even one <strong>of</strong> those tiny s<strong>of</strong>tboxes, doesn't really do much to s<strong>of</strong>ten<br />

the light. Your shadows will usually be very sharp. What it MAY do is waste enough light bouncing<br />

around the room that some <strong>of</strong> those hard-edged shadows are filled, slightly, and that will usually be a bit<br />

more pleasing. My favorite wedding strobe remains the bulky Norman 200C, with its big old 5"<br />

reflector. It's certainly not as efficient as the smaller polished reflectors on most manufacturer strobes,<br />

but in spreading so much light around the room, it gives a lot more pleasing on-camera (or on-bracket)<br />

look, thanks to the spill coming back <strong>of</strong>f the walls and ceiling <strong>of</strong> the room.<br />

-- David Spellman, June 25, 1997<br />

Nikon now sells a wireless TTL slave unit (similar to the Ike-Lite product). It's called the SU-4 and sells<br />

for about $70US.<br />

-- Mike West, February 5, 1999<br />

"Photography is the recording <strong>of</strong> light rays"...hmmm..what about artistic merit huh?? Things like<br />

composition, finding the moment, perspective, what about all that?....how about changing the definition<br />

to be: the capturing <strong>of</strong> images for an artistic or informative purpose...(screw the "light rays" part it<br />

sounds too pseudo technical)...? :-) my 2 cents worth....akhilesh bajaj<br />

-- Akh Baj, June 7, 1999<br />

Regarding flash photography...I generally hate it and try to avoid it whenever possible. However, my<br />

amateur photojournalistic tendencies sometimes preclude me from using a slow shutter speed to capture<br />

ambient light. So, to reduce harsh shadows, I take one <strong>of</strong> two approaches.<br />

The Diffuser: I have a LumiQuest Pocket Bouncer which appreciate immeasurably. It is the most<br />

compact way to achieve a pleasant s<strong>of</strong>tness <strong>of</strong> light. If you've never seen one <strong>of</strong> these, it is a trapezoidal<br />

hood that attaches to the flash with Velcro. The flash head is pointed straight up and light is bounced <strong>of</strong>f<br />

the hood. It is, in effect, a portable <strong>of</strong> the perfect color and reflective property. I find it immensely useful<br />

outdoors and in rooms with very high ceilings. The only drawback is light loss, which limits the distance<br />

you can stand from your subject.<br />

The Bracket: I've used two, a Sunpack and a Strob<strong>of</strong>rame. I think that the Strob<strong>of</strong>rame is probably a bit<br />

better, as it gives two positions, directly above the prism housing, a approximately ten inches from the<br />

lens, or to the side <strong>of</strong> the camera, upside down. Limitations include the the rather large nature <strong>of</strong> the<br />

accessory, which makes it a bit difficult to toss into a Domke F2. The Sunpack is a handle grip with a<br />

hot shoe on top. It is marginally more comfortable to hold that the Strob<strong>of</strong>rame in addition to being<br />

smaller and lighter. (Weight is an important consideration; a Nikon FE2 with motor drive, 180/2.8, flash<br />

bracket and Vivitar 283 is not only heavy but awkwardly shaped.) Both <strong>of</strong> the brackets run about $70.<br />

They are certainly nice, but the diffuser is what stays in the camera bag.<br />

-- Timothy Breihan, June 12, 1999<br />

http://www.photo.net/making-photographs/light (14 <strong>of</strong> 22)7/3/2005 2:22:38 AM

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!