13.12.2012 Views

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Choosing a Computer System for Digital Imaging<br />

Printer manufacturers and third parties have improved their inks and papers to the<br />

point where inkjet prints can <strong>of</strong>ten exceed the life <strong>of</strong> minilab prints.<br />

That's a really tall claim. Have you done real tests? What papers and printers were<br />

tested? Any links? Were Fuji Crystal Archive and Kodak Royal tested? Who did<br />

the testing and under what conditions? What kind <strong>of</strong> accelerated aging tests were<br />

done?<br />

-- Vincent J M, December 19, 2002<br />

I thought I'd had a few comments on Corel PhotoPaint, a rather nice digital imaging<br />

program.<br />

My first encounter with a real graphic program was with CorelDraw 3, something<br />

like 10 years ago. (CorelDraw is Corel's vector imaging program, counterpart to<br />

Adobe Illustrator.) My uncle was using it at the time, and I decided to learn about<br />

how it worked. At that time PhotoPaint was a minor add-on to CorelDraw and only<br />

a minor improvement on Windows 3.1 Paint program. As the versions went, Corel<br />

progressively expanded and developped the Corel Draw graphics suite, turning<br />

PhotoPaint in an amazingly powerful program without actually inflating the price<br />

tag.<br />

I haven't tried the latest version (PhotoPaint 12 I believe.) but I've work quite a lot<br />

with versions 7, 9 and 10 and they were all real good. Every time I read a tutorial<br />

about photo editing, it was based on Adobe PhotoShop. Everytime I was able to do<br />

the same thing with PhotoPaint. The tools have the same name. The settings are<br />

very similar. The set <strong>of</strong> commands in a picture editing program can only vary so<br />

much.<br />

Now I understand that some people really need some <strong>of</strong> the arcane functions found<br />

only in Adobe PhotoShop. It is also true that for a pr<strong>of</strong>essional potographer, the<br />

digital editing program is a rather minor part <strong>of</strong> the investment. But me, I'd rather<br />

pay one third <strong>of</strong> the price, use the remainder for a bigger monitor or a new lens and<br />

get a nice vector drawing program as an added bonus.<br />

In case I didn't really get my point across, if you're building a digital editing<br />

workstation from scratch, I suggest you take a real good look at Corel PhotoPaint.<br />

Serge<br />

-- Serge Boucher, February 2, 2003<br />

http://www.photo.net/photo/computers (27 <strong>of</strong> 33)7/3/2005 2:19:07 AM

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!