13.12.2012 Views

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Dead Trees<br />

An excellent magazine that I came across on the newstand a few months ago is "Black & White" (the<br />

masthead reads "B&W"). The editors classify it as a magazine for collectors <strong>of</strong> photography (*every*<br />

photograph in the magazine is for sale), though they do recognize the value <strong>of</strong> their magazine to<br />

photographers. Each issue (thus far) contains a nice mix <strong>of</strong> old and new talents working in every format<br />

(so along as the results are in black & white). Each photographers' works are accompanied by some brief<br />

biographical information or a short interview that provides a nice bit <strong>of</strong> context.<br />

Not a place to get information about equipment or other technical matters, but if you enjoy learning by<br />

looking, get a copy <strong>of</strong> this magazine.<br />

-- Ronald Buchanan, November 9, 1999<br />

I subscribe to 2 other magazines primarily to learn photographic techniques. DoubleTake is a quarterly<br />

magazine with numerous photographic essays. It has both color and b&w photgraphy. Not related to<br />

photography, Double also provides plenty <strong>of</strong> good fiction.<br />

I was quite surprised to see that Life magazine was not listed. Dazzling photographs in every issue. A<br />

qualitative way <strong>of</strong> learning about photography, seeing what appeals to you.<br />

-- Gary Marshall, November 21, 1999<br />

No-one's mentioned Amateur Photographer, which claims to be the oldest photo journal in the world -<br />

certainly they've been in continuous publication for well over a century. It's a UK magazine which is<br />

perhaps why it's not mentioned here. It's weeekly, so there is a feeling that some weeks it can be a bit<br />

thin - not much news that week, the selected photos aren't terribly good, uninteresting reviews - but on<br />

other occasions it can be excellent. For example their Millenium issue was very good - a review <strong>of</strong> the<br />

photographic century, with lots <strong>of</strong> old photos (<strong>of</strong>ten from their own archives - one advantage <strong>of</strong> having<br />

over 100 years <strong>of</strong> history to draw on). And there was a fascinating comparative review <strong>of</strong> cameras (all<br />

from Kodak) from the beginning, middle and end <strong>of</strong> the century - a Box Brownie, a RTetina (I think)<br />

and a digital. Interestingly they praised the Retina, were complimentary about the Brownie, but were<br />

critical <strong>of</strong> the digital (and I can't remember which one it was).<br />

Also I think they're pretty frank about equipment reviews.<br />

-- Tom Burke, January 13, 2000<br />

The Photography Book by the Editors <strong>of</strong> Phaidon Press, 1997 Phaidon Press Limited. ISBN 0-7148-<br />

3634-6. 512 pages. You can order this book from amazon.com .<br />

If you wanted to show <strong>of</strong>f the history <strong>of</strong> photography, covering 150 years, how would you do it? If you<br />

were Philip Greenspun, you'd put together a Web site. Fortunately for the non-web world, Phaidon press<br />

http://www.photo.net/books/ (10 <strong>of</strong> 20)7/3/2005 2:23:26 AM

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!