13.12.2012 Views

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Color Printers<br />

The set that were made on the inexpensive ink jet printer looked like the typical<br />

low resolution, lots <strong>of</strong> dots stereotypical cheap digital stuff that many people are<br />

familiar with.<br />

The dye sublimation prints looked good enough that they could have easily fooled<br />

a casual viewer into thinking that they were small photographs.<br />

I don't know whether the difference was printer setup s<strong>of</strong>tware related or if it was<br />

completely due to process. In any event, the difference was huge.<br />

-- Glen Johnson, January 13, 1997<br />

There's been a rash <strong>of</strong> new, low-cost and reputedly "photo quality" inkjet printers<br />

released onto the market. In particular, the Canon BJC-4200 and 4550 (A3/tabloid<br />

sized), and the Epson 500 are reputed to give near photo quality at around 720dpi.<br />

Whilst there's plenty <strong>of</strong> reviews <strong>of</strong> these by the computer press, I've yet to find any<br />

reviews by folks with a photographic bent ...<br />

-- David Gurr, February 18, 1997<br />

I have an Epson Stylus Colour II printer which I use for colour prints (Photoshop<br />

produced files from either scanned or digital camera output). The quality is 'near<br />

photographic' if you use Epson High Quality (720 dpi) paper (standard and glossy<br />

paper is available). However, the cost <strong>of</strong> this paper is about $2.50/sheet (8.5" x<br />

11"). I have compared the output for the same image printed with a Tectronix<br />

dyesub printer and the dyesub images are superior. No dots are visible- even with a<br />

magnifying glass- because the printing method 'melts' adjacent pixels together<br />

during the printing process. Since the 'melted' pixels emmulate the silver grains <strong>of</strong><br />

traditional photographic paper, I think that this approaches (but does not equal)<br />

'true' photographic quality.<br />

-- Barry Hargrave, March 7, 1997<br />

I believe a whole lot <strong>of</strong> photographers are setting themselves up for a rude shock<br />

when all <strong>of</strong> their digital prints start fading away. The fact is that other than the<br />

Kokak Xtralife ribbon prints, nothing is going to last!! Until photographers demand<br />

(and are willing to support) printing that lasts, this will continue to be the time<br />

bomb <strong>of</strong> the digital renaissance.<br />

-- Jeff Mandell, March 7, 1997<br />

http://www.photo.net/equipment/digital/printers/primer (4 <strong>of</strong> 36)7/3/2005 2:20:36 AM

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!