13.12.2012 Views

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Studio Photography<br />

you shoot and you develop your style and knowlege <strong>of</strong> equipment through experience. In the meantime<br />

you use what you have available. Granted, its fun to use studio lights and if you've got the money and<br />

the desire, well then why not. personally id buy what the rental houses carry so i can get accessories<br />

when i need them. But its not the only way. I shoot for a living and i frequently use desklamps, florecent<br />

lights fixtures, cieling lights, or whatever. when i was starting, i was sure i needed strobes. I finally got<br />

some and as soon as i had them came to the realization that my best work happened when i used more<br />

inventive light sources. My absolute favorite light (i shoot people) is day light through a window or<br />

reflected <strong>of</strong>f a wall. Sometimes I walk around until i see the light i want reflecting <strong>of</strong>f a building. the<br />

point is that photography requires adaptability, inventiveness, and imagination. Not brand x or tool y. If<br />

someone needs a colour meter its because their client needs accurate color and by the time anyone is in a<br />

position to have to worry about it they will know this stuff. Saying you need piece <strong>of</strong> equipment x is like<br />

saying you need an f1 race car to drive for a living. If you want to race in the f1 circuit then yah, if you<br />

want to deliver milk then maybe not.<br />

very happy to see this dialogue happening. The photoworld needs forums badly.<br />

-- dvd wmth, September 30, 2001<br />

I'd like to challenge the author's comments re: White Lightning flashes. I have used one <strong>of</strong> their model<br />

10000 units for a number <strong>of</strong> years. I find that the performance is exactly as claimed for output. Did you<br />

conduct your own tests to determine that their WS ratings were inflated by a factor <strong>of</strong> 2?<br />

Generally, I found your site to be very helpful and informative. Your comment about Paul Buff,<br />

however, seems to qualify as a "cheap shot." I find no test data to back it up.<br />

-- William Croninger, February 28, 2002<br />

I would just like to give a small bit <strong>of</strong> advise to those <strong>of</strong> you who want to get the best out <strong>of</strong> your flash<br />

meters: when you have a flashmeter that has variable shutter speeds and you want to find out how much<br />

the flash is blasing out, (this is especially evident with outdoor portraits) set your meter shutter speed to<br />

at LEAST 1/500th <strong>of</strong> a second. This will cancel out most (if not all) <strong>of</strong> the ambient light that will alter<br />

your readings. I specialize in outdoor portraiture, and was amazed at the difference in meter readings<br />

when I learned this. For me, it was a good two to three stop difference. You may try and get other<br />

results, but this is what I have found to be more effective. Jeremy Hall<br />

-- Jeremy Hall, April 17, 2002<br />

I'm a first year photo major, and I've been shooting for no more then two years. With that background in<br />

mind, I found the Minolta Flashmeter-IV to be totally self explanitory (contrary to the opinion <strong>of</strong> the<br />

author, who found it to be muddled and confusing). It doesn't have too many buttons, and even without<br />

the user's manual I was able utilize most <strong>of</strong> its functions.<br />

-- Tom Eldred, October 17, 2002<br />

http://www.photo.net/studio/primer (15 <strong>of</strong> 17)7/3/2005 2:18:01 AM

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!