13.12.2012 Views

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Portrait Photography<br />

Regards<br />

Rich Jacobs<br />

-- Rich Jacobs, February 11, 1998<br />

I sometimes use a Yashica-Mat 124G with the normal 80mm lens. Properly used, it can give superb results. The<br />

challenge for portraits is that the lens perspective is too close. And you're on your own for filters if you want a<br />

warm or s<strong>of</strong>t effect. So, get creative, back up and crop the big square negative later. And speaking <strong>of</strong> film,<br />

because <strong>of</strong> the higher cost, you'll be enticed to slow down and shoot more efficiently.<br />

-- Albert E. Anderson, March 22, 1998<br />

Great article.<br />

I have a couple <strong>of</strong> points though. You mentioned in the article about film selection: "If you're doing color, you'll<br />

want subtle tones, low color saturation, and low-ish contrast. My favorite films are Fuji Astia, Kodak 100SW".<br />

Those choices <strong>of</strong> films kind <strong>of</strong> contradicts your statement though. Astia is considered by many to be almost<br />

"Velvia Light". Great color saturation but acurate skin tones. And <strong>of</strong> course, Kodak 100SW has high saturation<br />

too. That's what the "S" in SW means...the W means toward the warm tones.<br />

Fuji NPS is a great one though for low contrast/ saturation...which is why it's such a great wedding film.<br />

-- Scott Gant, June 28, 1998<br />

Scott's right <strong>of</strong> course about the ISO 100 slide films being pretty saturated. Still, that's sort <strong>of</strong> all that you can get<br />

these days in slide film.<br />

-- Philip Greenspun, June 28, 1998<br />

On the subject <strong>of</strong> using fast primes for portraiture, I'd like to <strong>of</strong>fer a lens that is: Inexpensive,Sharp, and handy to<br />

use. That is the Nikon 100mm/2.8 E (AIS) lens that has been around for years. This lens is available (used) in the<br />

neighborhood <strong>of</strong> about $100 or so. Several lens raters have noted that this is a good lens for optical quality, but<br />

seem to downcheck it somewhat for mechanical quality because <strong>of</strong> the plastic build. That's not a problem for<br />

studio work though, and for the field -- just don't use it to pound nails. Any comments by others?<br />

Bill Briggs - unklbil@csonline.net<br />

-- Bill Briggs, February 24, 1999<br />

As a pr<strong>of</strong>essional photographer specialising on location fashion and potrait shoots, I can vouch for the countless<br />

times an 80-200 f2.8 has saved me from many a tight corner. Shiv Saran<br />

http://www.photo.net/portraits/intro (11 <strong>of</strong> 37)7/3/2005 2:16:41 AM

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!