13.12.2012 Views

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Choosing a Computer System for Digital Imaging<br />

Any pearls <strong>of</strong> wisdom anyone?<br />

-- Ajoy Prabhu (www.AjoyPrabhu.com), May 22, 2002<br />

The following is gleaned from what I have read from reliable online and print<br />

sources as well as my own experience.<br />

Dual monitors (aka Dual Head) -- There are two ways to do this: use a video card<br />

that has two outputs, or use two video cards. I have not tried to use two video<br />

cards; I expect there would be difficulties with resource conflicts. Probably best to<br />

use two cards from the same manufacturer.<br />

Matrox used to be the king <strong>of</strong> dual-head (and quad, etc.!) cards. Now ATI and<br />

nVidia have also gotten into the act. If you don't care about 3D performance<br />

(mostly used in games), Matrox is still an excellent choice. I have used a number <strong>of</strong><br />

their cards, albeit with only one monitor, and had no complaints. Their 2D quality,<br />

which is what you need for photo editing, is legendary. Their s<strong>of</strong>tware (driver)<br />

support for dual-head is supposed to be good and the cards run about $120 for a<br />

G450 dual-head with 32MB video RAM.<br />

ATI makes a number <strong>of</strong> dual-head cards. I have a Radeon 8500 which works OK.<br />

ATI's problem has always been with driver support but they seem to be improving.<br />

Their 2D quality is also good. ATI used to make all their own cards but now they<br />

also sell chips to other companies so it is more difficult to know what you are<br />

getting. Lots <strong>of</strong> choices from

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!