13.12.2012 Views

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Color Printers<br />

bit scanner/md 1000 and md 2300. md 2010 is too grainy for photos. md 1000 is<br />

much better, has wax- type-printer-like pattern but image behind pattern is sharp.<br />

output-for layout or visitcards is quick, around 7 min.2010 takes only 3.5min. md<br />

2300 is really the printer for all photo-freaks. it has no competitors yet. prints have<br />

no grain, shadow- details are good. the ink- printing-system only produces stripes<br />

which can only be seen when light is reflecting the surface. alsp told will introduce<br />

a bigger sized- model for 33x48 cm? size. they are solving a problem concerning<br />

printing 4-times(4 inks) precisely. paper-path-problems. as a panorama-freak i<br />

asked alsp and a supplier- company to reflect about banner type-possibility. md<br />

2300 costs less than 1000 usd.<br />

-- michael przewrocki switzerland, March 12, 1998<br />

For large prints (72" by 1200")I have been getting great results from the 200dpi<br />

Lambda machine. It uses lasers to write onto color photographic paper or<br />

Ilfochrome paper. The output looked way better than making an LVT chrome and<br />

printing that with an enlarger. The 200dpi is continuous-tone, not to be confused<br />

with a halftone like what the Epson Stylus Photo uses. For images up to 20x33, the<br />

Kodak LED photographic printer (over $100,000) is 250dpi and looks excellent.<br />

For smaller prints (up to about 18 inches), the Fujix Pictrography 4000 is best.<br />

-- Robert SIlvers, April 23, 1998<br />

I print from Kodak Photo CD and other sources using the Epson 600. It print<br />

720X1440. I use primarily Epson Matte Finish Photo Quality paper(11 cents a<br />

sheet). I laminate the prints for handling and waterpro<strong>of</strong>ness. I have directly<br />

compared the same Adobe photoshop file (18megs for a 8X10 print)printed on my<br />

printer vs a Fujix thermoautochrome or even a C41 print and find no perceptable<br />

difference. I love my cheap little Epson 600.<br />

-- Charles Clemens, April 27, 1998<br />

So far there aren't many "personal" (in the $500 range) printers which can produce<br />

photographic output. Most <strong>of</strong> the ones that can require special inks and papers<br />

which drive the per-page cost up. While I'm waiting for a printer in my price/<br />

performance range, I'm making display prints from digital images at Kodak Image<br />

Magic Print Stations. You can get a list (with addresses) at the Kodak website.<br />

You'll have to call the stores yourself and ask if they have the "Business Builder<br />

'98" s<strong>of</strong>tware which allows you to print from floppy. Most places charge between<br />

$7-10 for an 8.5"x11" sheet. When you print the sheet you can decide on any <strong>of</strong><br />

several layouts which provide anywhere from 1 8"x10" print to 20 wallet size<br />

prints. If you don't have a nice roll cutter be sure to choose the $10/page place<br />

which will cut your prints for you.<br />

http://www.photo.net/equipment/digital/printers/primer (8 <strong>of</strong> 36)7/3/2005 2:20:36 AM

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!