13.12.2012 Views

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Choosing a Computer System for Digital Imaging<br />

fine art prints? Any desktop film scanner will do a decent enough job for making<br />

small prints from an inkjet printer. Only a drum scanner will capture enough<br />

information for 30x40 fine art prints. There is a middle ground <strong>of</strong> course, but you<br />

should carefully consider your needs, your standards, and the limitations <strong>of</strong><br />

affordable scanners before deciding to purchase one.<br />

Scanner manufacturers throw around DPI and Dmax ratings to impress consumers.<br />

DPI improves with each generation, and advertised Dmax ratings <strong>of</strong> home scanners<br />

inch closer to those <strong>of</strong> drum scanners with each new introduction. Be very skeptical<br />

<strong>of</strong> these claims, especially when it comes to Dmax. There is no industry standard<br />

for measuring Dmax, so marketing departments are pretty much free to claim<br />

whatever figures they think will drive sales.<br />

Even worse, no manufacturer publishes signal-to-noise ratios. S/N is the biggest<br />

drawback to home desktop scanners. You can find several models with similar DPI<br />

and Dmax ratings, but when you use them you'll see noticeable differences in<br />

noise. Compare those scanners with a drum scan, and you'll clearly see the<br />

difference. Where drum scanners capture clean details, home scanners exhibit<br />

muddiness. This is not an issue for 90 percent <strong>of</strong> the people using home scanners.<br />

As mentioned, they're good enough for printing to inkjet printers.<br />

Don't let this dissuade you from buying a desktop film scanner. They're certainly<br />

good enough for most peoples needs. Newspapers around th world use desktop<br />

scanners and get results far better than in the old days <strong>of</strong> shooting halftones and<br />

color separations. Desktop scanners serve well to get your work in your computer,<br />

where you can publish it on the Internet or write it to CD to send to prospective<br />

clients. And inkjet prints, when done properly, are indistinguishable from lab<br />

prints. But if you're after that last 10 percent <strong>of</strong> quality, nothing you can afford to<br />

buy will do the job.<br />

This is where service bureaus come in. They can afford the best equipment because<br />

they can spread the cost out over hundreds <strong>of</strong> customers. Beware, though, that not<br />

all service bureaus are created equal. The majority <strong>of</strong> them specialize in prepress<br />

scanning, and their standards are simply not high enough for the fine art market.<br />

Look for a service bureau that employs fine art photographers and specializes in<br />

working with the fine art market. The photo.net archives contain many<br />

recommendations for good service bureaus.<br />

S<strong>of</strong>tware Choices<br />

There are many choices, but only one standard. PhotoShop is the standard. Every<br />

service bureau has PhotoShop installed on its computers. If you're going to work<br />

with a service bureau, PhotoShop is your only choice. The publishing industry<br />

http://www.photo.net/photo/computers (6 <strong>of</strong> 33)7/3/2005 2:19:07 AM

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!