13.12.2012 Views

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Portrait Photography<br />

me rather than at the camera, so that in the photograph he is looking above the viewer. Generally this is not a<br />

good thing. (Recently I've used a digital camera with a tilting LCD display. Working with children I <strong>of</strong>ten hold<br />

the camera down at the child's eye level and look down at the tilted display. This produces the same challenge as<br />

the twin-lens reflex.)<br />

Regarding the disadvantage <strong>of</strong> a point-and-shoot camera <strong>of</strong> always having much depth <strong>of</strong> field, the same is true<br />

<strong>of</strong> many digital cameras, particularly those without removable lenses. Most digital cameras on the market have<br />

very small sensors and therefore very short focal-length lenses. Short focal-length lenses produce great depth <strong>of</strong><br />

field, even at a relatively wide aperture. With such cameras, to get the least depth <strong>of</strong> field (for a blurred<br />

background), zoom all the way out and use a wide-open aperture (small f/stop number).<br />

There are as many ways to make portraits as there are people making them. Be creative!<br />

-- Arlin Geyer, December 9, 2004<br />

I own a Canon EOS 50mm/1.8, and a Sigma 70-200mm/2.8. The first lense I bought new for ~$75.00. The Sigma<br />

I bought used for ~$400.00.<br />

I've taken fantastic portraits with both.<br />

-- Heather Thivierge, December 18, 2004<br />

That picture <strong>of</strong> your gandfather with the dog...I don't like it. I personally think it is an example <strong>of</strong> a horrible<br />

portrait. Not that I can say much, i've only been shooting for a year, but i am practicing, and I would never use<br />

that photo as an example for anything. This is just my personal opinion on the content and execution <strong>of</strong> the<br />

photograph...not on you as a photographer.<br />

-- Emily Rose Bennett, January 3, 2005<br />

In his wonderful book "Once" photographer/author Wim Wenders provides a brillient and gritty perspective on<br />

capturing images. Of importance to this thread on portrait photography, Wenders notes, "Taking pictures is<br />

always an act <strong>of</strong> presumption and rebellion."<br />

I have observed through the years that the formula for a good portrait requires that the "permission" <strong>of</strong> the subject<br />

be in equal or greater measure to the "presumption" <strong>of</strong> the photographer. So too, the photographer's rebellios<br />

drive to capture an image must be accompanied, again, in equal or greater measure, with respect for the soul<br />

within the subject.<br />

A good portrait, <strong>of</strong> course, will exhibit good light and composition, but if it is to capture the imagination <strong>of</strong><br />

anyone not related to the subject, it will exhibit passion and respect.<br />

Image:So warm PN.jpg<br />

-- Patrick MacDonald, January 6, 2005<br />

A good portrait can tell a lot about the subject, not just show the forms. For that, it helps if the subject is<br />

comfortable with the photographer.<br />

http://www.photo.net/portraits/intro (31 <strong>of</strong> 37)7/3/2005 2:16:41 AM

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!