13.12.2012 Views

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Tips for Using a Point & Shoot Camera<br />

As to Philips paragraph at the top <strong>of</strong> this article, I'm sure if he had been standing next to<br />

the girl with the point and shoot, he would have taken a better framed, better exposed,<br />

sharper and more contrasty shot with his slr.<br />

-- Jim Tardio, May 25, 1999<br />

Sorry, Jim -- I disagree w/r/t Philip's example at the graduation. If Philip were sitting<br />

next to the woman with the point and shoot, he wouldn't have his big cache <strong>of</strong> gear with<br />

him -- a point & shoot is likely all he'd be able to bring to that position.<br />

...he would have taken a better framed, better exposed, sharper and more contrasty shot<br />

with his slr<br />

Better framed? No, that's entirely related to the skill <strong>of</strong> the photographer. Better exposed?<br />

With print film (and a little bit <strong>of</strong> brain power) it wouldn't make a difference. Sharper?<br />

Yes. More contrasty? Likely.<br />

But this is all missing Philip's point -- you can bring a point & shoot with you almost<br />

anywhere. You can whip it out at a moment's notice and get the shot. Hence the value <strong>of</strong><br />

a point & shoot. They may not suit you, Jim, but that doesn't mean they're without value.<br />

-- Russ Arcuri, May 27, 1999<br />

Sorry Russ--I never said they were not <strong>of</strong> any value, and I never said I didn't like them. I<br />

said I am losing my faith in them. I also said I am considering buying a Ricoh GR-1, and<br />

still use my Minolta FZE.<br />

I really don't know what Phil would have been using had he been closer, but I would<br />

have had an slr with 1 or 2 lenses AND a point and shoot.<br />

And I just don't agree that a point and shoot is better than a cheap body with a slow<br />

consumer zoom and Moby flash. When Phil first wrote this piece I did, but after having<br />

gone through many <strong>of</strong> these cameras I've come to the conclusion, IN MY OPINION, that<br />

they're not much better than a disposable camera.<br />

For example: take the Zeiss lens away from the T4 and what do have left? A little box<br />

where the only control you have is turning the flash on and <strong>of</strong>f. If light is indeed the main<br />

ingredient <strong>of</strong> photography...as Phil states...how do you capture it faithfully when you<br />

have no idea what the camera is exposing the film at? With practice all you have is an<br />

educated guess at best. How do you lock focus if the camera is on a tripod? How do alter<br />

film speed?<br />

http://www.photo.net/learn/point-and-shoot-tips (13 <strong>of</strong> 35) [5/15/2002 7:15:46 PM]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!