13.12.2012 Views

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Choosing a Computer System for Digital Imaging<br />

built-in CMYK separation) that makes drum scanners better for large print shops.<br />

Printing Choices.<br />

Consider sending scanned, preprocessed files to a digital lab. They will "print" your<br />

work on a real photographic paper. Of course, based on your targeted audience<br />

(friends/family vs fine art) you may want to select different labs that give you<br />

different processes, results, source scans requirements and, finally, prices.<br />

-- Pawel Loj, January 20, 2002<br />

I'll confine my comments to the PC world since I'm not very familiar with Macs.<br />

SCSI: What makes great is not so much ultimate speed and throughput but that it<br />

<strong>of</strong>floads the I/O processing from your CPU. This means that you system will<br />

continue to be responsive when moving a lot <strong>of</strong> data. ATA100 (and now ATA133)<br />

disks will move a lot <strong>of</strong> data quickly but they will bog down the main CPU making<br />

the machine unresponsive. Som IDE RAID controllers will also <strong>of</strong>fload the<br />

processing similar to a SCSI controller. I have used and own both SCSI and IDE<br />

based systems and the SCSI systems are more responsive.<br />

Processor: Seriously consider going to a dual processor system. Once again, this is<br />

about not having the system bog down. Dual processors will make multi-tasking<br />

much easier.<br />

If my budget were limited, I'd probably pick dual processors over SCSI.<br />

-- Paul Wilson, January 21, 2002<br />

I felt like this article just lacked the "meat" that I was hoping it would have.<br />

Leaving out the mid-range options seems like a mistake to me. I'm using the Canon<br />

FS4000US scanner and Epson 1280 Photo printer, and am having a great time with<br />

the digital darkroom. I'm blown away by the quality that I'm getting right <strong>of</strong>f the<br />

bat; I'm sure I'll improve as I learn new techniques. This article came across to me<br />

as relatively discouraging -- the exact opposite <strong>of</strong> the experience I'm having right<br />

now.<br />

-- Scott Hill, January 21, 2002<br />

Vincent J M:<br />

You post: "look at the Wilhelm research fiasco". I have used the Wilhelm pages for<br />

deciding on printer and paper. Has something happened (fiasco) that I have not<br />

seen?<br />

http://www.photo.net/photo/computers (15 <strong>of</strong> 33)7/3/2005 2:19:07 AM

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!