13.12.2012 Views

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

How Shift Lenses Change your Life<br />

Instead, a one-piece TS-E 35mm F/2.8 or 3.5 lens should have much better optical quality (no TC), as<br />

well as being cheaper (no TC), lighter (no TC), and brighter (no TC).<br />

It would be nice if the TS-E lenses became TS-EF - aut<strong>of</strong>ocus. I firmly believe that everyone's 24mm<br />

(and 35mm...) lens should have tilt and shift, for when they are needed, but aut<strong>of</strong>ocus when they aren't.<br />

Canon, with their great all-electronic mount, could easily allow this.<br />

New Focusing Screens<br />

We need a new focusing screen for shifted composition. Canon makes a screen with a grid, for verifying<br />

perspective. This is great, except the TS-E lenses are all manual focus, and the grid screen doesn't have a<br />

focus aid. There is a perfectly good screen with the usual split-circle, but no grid lines <strong>of</strong> any sort. So,<br />

we are left estimating ranges and looking at the distance scale on the focus ring.<br />

For tilted composition, the situation is even worse - the distance scale only tells us what is happening at<br />

the image center. The scale might say 3 meters when the lens is actually focused at infinity on one edge<br />

and 50cm at the other. Calculating lens tilt mathematically is practically a black art. I only know a<br />

couple people that even know how, and they don't do it in their head on the scene. They guess a tilt, then<br />

squint at the viewfinder trying to guess if it is sharp enough. This is hard at f/3.5 (the Canon 24mm lens)<br />

or f/4.9 (same with 1.4x TC). I'd like a focusing screen with the normal split-circle focus aid, but instead<br />

<strong>of</strong> merely the image center, have a circle (or major portion there<strong>of</strong>) at each corner or perhaps centered on<br />

each <strong>of</strong> four sides.<br />

More Advanced Camera Electronics<br />

An second alternative would be a camera that tells us what focus we're at, at the extreme edges <strong>of</strong> the<br />

camera. This would involve the camera asking the lens 1) focus distance, 2) tilt, 3) rotation <strong>of</strong> tilt, and 4)<br />

a constant or two related to focal length. The camera then calculates the focus distance extremes and<br />

displays them on the LCD. A photographer who could estimate ranges accurately could adjust the lens<br />

until the readout matches his estimates.<br />

A third alternative would have two focusing rings for near and far focus. It would use Canon "E-M".<br />

(This means that the focusing ring is just an electronic input sensed by the computer, that drives a motor<br />

to change focus.) We would get a focus motor, and a second motor that tilts the lens appropriately. The<br />

focus rings would be right next to each other, so normal operation would involve grabbing both<br />

simultaneously.<br />

http://www.photo.net/photo/canon/tilt-shift (8 <strong>of</strong> 9)7/3/2005 2:24:04 AM

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!