13.12.2012 Views

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Portrait Photography<br />

Pretty informative user friendly site. You know, one <strong>of</strong> the things that has always both fascinated me and irritated<br />

me is what I call the "expensive camera mystique" or ECM. I swore that ONLY a Nikon 90s or Canon EOSn1<br />

could take the great pictures. An impressive photo exhibit held by a woman armed with only a measly Canon AE-<br />

1 changed all that. The way I figure, some <strong>of</strong> my most favorite photos were shot on cameras many times inferior<br />

to the so called pro gear. I still however would like to own the 90s for its high ratings, lens availability and<br />

versatilty. It's a great camera to hold and prices on the model have dropped in recent years. I must add that<br />

portrait photography is my favorite category next to still life and I prefer b/w to color about 75% <strong>of</strong> the time.<br />

Nikon prime lenses are expensive but the only ones I want are the 20mm, 24mm, 85mm and 105mm macro.<br />

Hopeully I can find some used ones! Favorite shutterbugs: annie l. richard avedon linda mccartney (r.i.p.)<br />

mapplethorpe<br />

shutterbugs i disl<br />

-- greg b., May 30, 1999<br />

For the longest time, my main portrait lens was a nikon 75-150 3.5 Series-E. This lens was very sharp, and great<br />

in the studio due to the constant maximum aperture. When I got my F4s, I decided to get an 85 1.8 af, and have<br />

sworn by this lens ever since. The wide aperture REALLY makes the subject pop! I like this lens so much, that I<br />

sold the 75-150!<br />

-- Robert Mossack, October 20, 1999<br />

Hi Philip,<br />

Just visited your portrait photo page. Thanks for the infos, really helpful. However, you seem to concentrate in<br />

using expensive equips. For a lowly cheap (and poor) student like me, it's kinda hard to get them. Personally, I<br />

found out that using Canon 50mm/1.8 Mk. II is enough for my need. As I like to get up close and personal to my<br />

subjects. For candid portrait (capturing expression), it seems to me that people notice you less when you're close<br />

to them. They thought you were focusing on something else. I'm just an amateur, however, so my opinion might<br />

not be correct. Thanks again for the website, really helpful.<br />

Regards, fajar<br />

-- Fajar Reksoprodjo, October 22, 1999<br />

Here is what I did for buying portrait lens. First I bought cheap so called universal zoom lens. I think those lens<br />

really give some idea <strong>of</strong> charateristic focal length and give a chance novice like me to explore the different focal<br />

length. Eventhough quality <strong>of</strong> those lens was not great, To me It was acceptable. and later I can use as a preview<br />

lens for medium format camera that doesn't have camera meter. After analyze the picture I took, I can break<br />

down portrait into couple <strong>of</strong> the situation.<br />

1)Standard portrait: 2)Telephoto portrait:candid, natural unposed, long enough to be subjects aren't aware <strong>of</strong><br />

them being photographed 3)Environmental portrait:The subject and surroundings are equally important 4)<br />

Detailed Body part:Macro works on portrait 5)Exaggerated body portion portrait:So called wide angle close up<br />

portrait, for thsoe fun special effect, Using a distortion a minimizing hadicaped body portion for example making<br />

short leg looks longer. 6)Group portrait:Family photo, wedding photo something like that kind <strong>of</strong> gathering. Then<br />

http://www.photo.net/portraits/intro (13 <strong>of</strong> 37)7/3/2005 2:16:41 AM

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!