13.12.2012 Views

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Tripods<br />

metal screws are weak and if you twist the knobs a bit hard, it will slip. Same thing<br />

goes for the ball head locking levers also. (They should have used an all metal knob<br />

or designed a better plastic to screw connection.) Because <strong>of</strong> this I'm hesitant to<br />

tighten reallly hard since I dont want to damage the knobs. Unfortunately this has<br />

cost me dearly. One fine day as I was mounting my Nikon with 70-200 2.8 AF<br />

zoom, the center column twisted since it was not fully tightened, and whack, my<br />

lens came crashing down to the floor. Booo hooo hooo sniff sob... (how come those<br />

guys who trash their 300mm,600mm on their big balls dont cry?)<br />

I am not a pro and I dont take the tripod to far <strong>of</strong>f places, so for those <strong>of</strong> you who<br />

do, maybe you want to consider other brands. But still, I will say that the Uniloc<br />

System 1700 is an interesting piece <strong>of</strong> equipment since it can be set up like no<br />

ordinary tripod.<br />

About the Arca-Swiss B1 ball head, I will plonk down the money by taking a<br />

second morgage on the house and buy it through mail order from B&H. I will have<br />

my head examined after that. (Why <strong>of</strong> why dont RRS have email and more pics on<br />

their web page.)<br />

-- Mat Nikon, June 3, 2000<br />

Recently I just replaced my 3265 ballhead with the Bogen 3435QR. After couple<br />

months <strong>of</strong> usage, I must say this is the ballhead that I should have bought long ago.<br />

Don't get me wrong, I loved the 3265 for its quickness and easy to operate. But as<br />

my equipment got heavier, the limitation <strong>of</strong> 3265 started to show. The 3265 can<br />

only handle up to 5lbs. When I position my camera in the vertical position, the<br />

3265 would twist and turn. On the other hand, the 3435QR is a whole different<br />

ballhead. The Teflon coating makes it so smooth and easy to operate and rotate.<br />

The head is rock solid whether my camera (EOS A2 w/ 28-70L or 8-200L lens) is<br />

in vertical or horizontal position. It weighs about the same as the 3265 but can<br />

handle up to a massive 22lbs. The head can be operated with just a twist <strong>of</strong> the<br />

knob. It also has a tensioner adjustment ring so you can adjust the friction <strong>of</strong> the<br />

ballhead IAW your equipment. I used this ballhead in combination with the 3205<br />

tripod on a recent hiking trip at Yellowstone. It was a joy because the combo is so<br />

lite and compact. For $195 at B&H, 1/2 the cost <strong>of</strong> other "pr<strong>of</strong>essional" ballheads, I<br />

think this is the head to beat. Highly recommended for anyone looking for a<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essional, rock solid ballhead but without the $$$!!!!<br />

-- toan Nguyen, July 13, 2000<br />

I have the Manfrotto 055. I Bought it so I that I would have a tripod that would be<br />

at eye level without the centre column extended. it wobbles!! It shakes ; Most<br />

dissapointing. With a 500 mm mirror lens I have difficulty obtaining good results<br />

http://www.photo.net/equipment/tripods/philg (39 <strong>of</strong> 53)7/3/2005 2:21:13 AM

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!