13.12.2012 Views

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Color Printers<br />

poor-to-mediocre documentation <strong>of</strong> both the scanner and printer and the lack <strong>of</strong><br />

good material dedicated to producing photographic results using PhotoShop in<br />

conjunction with an Epson printer and consumer-level scanner).<br />

Disappointing is the lack well-documented workflow from s<strong>of</strong>tware and hardware<br />

vendors as well as comparisons among the users <strong>of</strong> these products whose<br />

experiences, using seemingly identical equipment and settings, vary widely. In<br />

short, the controls to establish a base-line from which one can make reliable<br />

experiments simply aren't there. One has to read widely and experiment with setup,<br />

configuration, and workflow. Just as an example, one enthusiast says to use<br />

(applicable to Window 98) the Color Management setting in the Epson driver;<br />

another says use ICM (when I use ICM, and follow all <strong>of</strong> his other suggestions, I<br />

get a color shift and generally darkening <strong>of</strong> the image). The HP scanner doesn t<br />

have an ICM pr<strong>of</strong>ile. This means that the scanner is not calibrated to the monitor<br />

and printer.<br />

My goal has been simple: work with a small number <strong>of</strong> images (color negative,<br />

slide, and black and white negative ) and try to produce a print from each that<br />

approaches or is equal or superior to the silver print (or slide original) <strong>of</strong> each. I<br />

have standardized on the Epson Photo Paper media, though I have tried the Epson<br />

film and some Lumijet paper as well (my colleague has tried a wide variety <strong>of</strong><br />

papers - some quite beautiful). I have configured PhotoShop 5.02 RGB to use<br />

Adobe 1998 color space, gamma 2.2 (I'm using Windows), and I use the same RGB<br />

space for the pr<strong>of</strong>ile. The Epson driver uses Custom Settings, Color Adjustment<br />

with Automatic selected. I have the paper set to Photo Paper, 1440 dpi. All other<br />

settings are defaultMy workflow is as follows: 1) scan the image using the Import<br />

command in PhotoShop (this launches the HP s<strong>of</strong>tware); 2) using the histogram, I<br />

adjust the levels to shift out <strong>of</strong> range pixels into the scanner s tonal range (this takes<br />

some trial and error to strike a balance between satisfying the histogram and<br />

keeping the image looking reasonable good); 3) once the scanned image appears in<br />

PhotoShop, I adjust the levels to bring them within the highlight and shadow<br />

ranges; 4) I check the histogram in PhotoShop, then go back into levels and fine<br />

tune; 5) I then make some small adjustments so the image looks "right" on the<br />

monitor; 6) I retouch the image using the "rubber stamp" tool; 7) I use the "unsharp<br />

mask" (usually with a threshold <strong>of</strong> 2-4 with the amount set to about 120%; 8) I<br />

resize the image and set resolution to a number which is a multiple <strong>of</strong> 1440 (ex:<br />

240, 360, etc); I then print the image.<br />

I have also scanned using a product called VueScan (Hamrick s<strong>of</strong>tware). This<br />

produces a considerably different scan from the HP s<strong>of</strong>tware and <strong>of</strong>fers a wider<br />

range <strong>of</strong> pre-scan controls, but no preview <strong>of</strong> the image, so all tweaking must be<br />

done post-scan (not the best method for optimizing image quality). This s<strong>of</strong>tware<br />

also allows for batch scanning, which may be convenient if you have a lot <strong>of</strong><br />

http://www.photo.net/equipment/digital/printers/primer (20 <strong>of</strong> 36)7/3/2005 2:20:36 AM

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!