13.12.2012 Views

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Star Streak Tutorial<br />

magnification, a 10" diameter scope will display objects at four times the brightness <strong>of</strong> a 5" scope at the<br />

same magnification. This is probably where the confusion arose.<br />

-- Vince Farnsworth, September 23, 1997<br />

Regarding long exposure star trail photography with camera lenses, remember that in a lot <strong>of</strong> climates<br />

moisture will condense on the lens surface as the temerature drops to dew point. So, your 6 hour shoot<br />

will be ruined by the lens fogging unless you take care to heat the lens element with a "dew chaser"<br />

assembly. The Kendrick system, http://kendrick-studio.com, is the best commercially available, or you<br />

can make your own using resistors and wire connected to a 12 volt battery source. Consult Sky and<br />

Telescope magazine archives for articles on this subject. The object is to keep your lens surface just<br />

above the dew point so it will stay moisture free.<br />

-- Greg Palman, May 30, 1998<br />

When the objective is to image faint stars, the aperture settings and focal settings are critical. Significant<br />

improvement will likely occur when optimal settings are used. Usually more sensitivity will be achieved<br />

by stopping down the aperture somewhat as reduction in illumination is more than <strong>of</strong>fset by a reduction<br />

in the circle <strong>of</strong> confusion (ie less light but more tightly imaged).<br />

As for focus, while the factory scale is "good enough" for most purposes, the true infinity focus is <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

different slightly than that indicated. Experimentation pays dividends.<br />

If no time to experiment, a rough guideline is to reduce apperture 1 stop from wide open.<br />

For the curious, the circle <strong>of</strong> confusion will be reduced as the aperture is closed more than optimal for<br />

the above purposes until diffraction effects about the aperture edges add disproportionate degradation.<br />

For a typical 50 mm lens, the smallest circle <strong>of</strong> confusion is found about f/8.<br />

-- John Ohrt, October 28, 1998<br />

Since no one mentioned it, I'd like to add a quick comment on photographing (or just observing) the<br />

moon. The least "interesting" time to do it is during full moon. Since the light <strong>of</strong> the sun hits the moons<br />

surface almost straight on, you won't have the shadows that bring out surface detail like mountains and<br />

craters. Half and quarter moons are much more interesting because you can see more <strong>of</strong> the features <strong>of</strong><br />

the terrain.<br />

-- Frank Wortner, March 24, 1999<br />

When's sunset? Where's the moon? When's the sun gonna come up? ...Get a Casio Fish-En-Time or<br />

Forester for $39 and you'll always know. Just punch your lat/lon into it and it tells you all that and even<br />

a graph <strong>of</strong> where the moon should be right now (if you're indoors and thinking about getting ready to<br />

http://www.photo.net/astro/star-streak (4 <strong>of</strong> 9)7/3/2005 2:15:29 AM

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!