13.12.2012 Views

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Camera<br />

say "make me a big print from this negative". Once you get home, use a pair <strong>of</strong> scissors to trim the big<br />

print until it is long and skinny and contains the subject matter <strong>of</strong> interest. This may sound absurd but it<br />

is in fact how most 35mm "panoramic mode" cameras operate. They use the same lens as in normal<br />

mode and mask <strong>of</strong>f the top and bottom <strong>of</strong> the frame. Then the laboratory knows that you wanted a long<br />

skinny print and it is obvious which portion <strong>of</strong> the neg to print (i.e., the non-blank portion). APS<br />

cameras do the same thing except that they record the panorama mode magnetically on the back <strong>of</strong> the<br />

film. The entire frame is exposed and you could later change your mind and ask the lab to print the<br />

whole frame.<br />

You won't get very high image quality if you print from only a tiny portion <strong>of</strong> a tiny negative. But that<br />

doesn't mean you need a true panoramic camera. You could just use a big view camera and bring the<br />

resulting 4x5, 5x7, or 8x10 sheet <strong>of</strong> film into a pro lab and tell them to print only the central portion.<br />

If that seems like a waste <strong>of</strong> film and effort, then the Fuji 617 that I own is for you. Fuji takes one <strong>of</strong><br />

their 5x7 view camera lenses and attaches it to a body that handles 120 and 220 roll film. So the<br />

photographer is freed from the bulk <strong>of</strong> the 5x7 view camera, from the drudgery <strong>of</strong> loading sheet film into<br />

film holders, and from having to spend $6 per exposure on film and processing (instead it is perhaps $3<br />

per exposure).<br />

Panoramic cameras don't have the perspective correction flexibility <strong>of</strong> the view camera from which they<br />

were cut down. This is very annoying if you're trying to capture architecture in a city. Panoramic<br />

cameras don't have the close-focus capability <strong>of</strong> view cameras. This is annoying if you want to include a<br />

person's face prominently in your image. Panoramic cameras can be unbelievably expensive compared<br />

to the view cameras from which they are derived. For example, Linh<strong>of</strong> makes a 617 camera similar to<br />

my Fuji. A Schneider 72mm lens for the camera is $4000. The same lens ready for use on any view<br />

camera was $1500 (prices from B&H Photo in December 1998).<br />

There are panoramic cameras that do things you could never do with a view camera and cropping. These<br />

have rotating lenses that capture up to 360 degrees onto long strips <strong>of</strong> film, e.g., the $650 Spinshot<br />

camera makes 7 frames on a 36-exposure roll <strong>of</strong> 35mm film. The Noblex is the standard rotating-lens<br />

http://www.photo.net/making-photographs/camera (7 <strong>of</strong> 9)7/3/2005 2:22:21 AM

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!