13.12.2012 Views

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Choosing a Computer System for Digital Imaging<br />

from the printers; they make it from the ink and paper. This is one reason to buy<br />

name-brand supplies, it supports the companies. I would not buy <strong>of</strong>f-brand ink<br />

anyway as it can ruin the printer.<br />

Ink comes in two basic types, dye or pigment based. Dye based inks don't last as<br />

long as pigment based. Some printers use pigment for black and dye for color.<br />

They cannot be used together, which is why you can get color shifts in the black<br />

areas, especially if you aren't using color pr<strong>of</strong>iling correctly. (They use pigment for<br />

black because it gives better text quality.) I only know <strong>of</strong> one printer that uses<br />

pigment based color inks: Epson 2000P. That is why they claim the images will last<br />

100 years if printed on the correct paper (e.g. Epson heavyweight matte) and<br />

protected from bright light, smog, etc.<br />

There are two ways to squirt the ink onto the paper. One way involves heating<br />

some <strong>of</strong> the ink to boiling, which produces pressure and forces it through the<br />

nozzle. The other way uses a piezo-electric device, which flexes when current is<br />

passed through it and forces the ink through the nozzle. Printers that use the first<br />

method usually have the head built into the cartridge so it is replaced every time<br />

you buy a new cartridge. This is usually touted as an advantage, but I figure that<br />

they wouldn't do it unless they had to; boiling the ink probably would clog the<br />

nozzles after a while.<br />

There's my two cents worth. Hope it's <strong>of</strong> use to someone.<br />

-- Brian Breczinski, May 28, 2002<br />

I used digital cameras for a while then realized that while digital images would<br />

only ever be as good as the resolution in which they were taken, negatives could<br />

always be rescanned. Film cameras can be as small as digital and there are some<br />

very sharp cameras around. From an archival point <strong>of</strong> view your negatives are way<br />

better than a CD too, but when you do this you need more computer than if you just<br />

shoot digital and download the images from the camera.<br />

The Nikon Coolscan 4000 is the cornerstone <strong>of</strong> the system. It has fairly nice<br />

s<strong>of</strong>tware included with good download support from Nikon for new versions and is<br />

very easy to use - feed in the negatives, choose output size and format, crop, adjust<br />

color and go. It's quite fast, and works on a Firewire interface, they even include a<br />

PCI Firewire card in the box. I can't scan prints or pages but I don't really need to. I<br />

haven't used any other negative scanners so I don't know if this is really the best -<br />

but it's very, very good.<br />

A Macintosh dual-1GHz G4 does everything else. It's easy to use and the included<br />

http://www.photo.net/photo/computers (24 <strong>of</strong> 33)7/3/2005 2:19:07 AM

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!