13.12.2012 Views

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Color Printers<br />

We are currently printing images on an Epson Photo EX using the MIS archival<br />

inks, the previous poster seems to have gotten some bad information. It's not quite<br />

as expensive as some believe, we are currently printing a run <strong>of</strong> 11x15 full color<br />

images (actual image size 9 3/4 x 13 1/2)and getting 25-30 prints from each<br />

cartidge. We probably average $2 per page in ink cost, most <strong>of</strong> our images are<br />

approximately 30 mb scans and we are using 140 lb. Arches hot press for the<br />

current work. The artists we have worked with have been pleased with the work<br />

both on Arches and Concorde Rag (note the Concorde costs 3x as much). While not<br />

scientific I have had one <strong>of</strong> the images printed in June '99 hanging in my window<br />

(Houston, TX) and no signs <strong>of</strong> fading yet.<br />

-- Jeff Measamer, January 18, 2000<br />

Just to be contrary, how <strong>of</strong>ten do you care about the archival quality <strong>of</strong> a printed<br />

color image?<br />

I'd care a *lot* about the lifetime <strong>of</strong> the media on which image file is recorded<br />

(what is the lifetime <strong>of</strong> a CD, CD-R or CD-RW?). But for the printed image - well I<br />

can always print out another copy later - possibly on a better printer :).<br />

Clearly if you are going posting your image on an outside wall in the sun, you have<br />

an issue. On the other hand some <strong>of</strong> our local fast-food joints appear to be selling<br />

blue food...<br />

-- Preston Bannister, April 17, 2000<br />

I have read several <strong>of</strong> the comments here and I find all <strong>of</strong> the different points <strong>of</strong><br />

view interesting. The one thing I do think is very exciting is the fact that Digital<br />

Photography is evolving into a very "respectable" format to express your art... or<br />

use as an alternative in your commercial applications... or just to show <strong>of</strong>f the kids<br />

to friends and family. I think it is worth reminding folks how far "Photo Quality"<br />

prints have come in just a few years. Especially in the low end market.<br />

I realize that most <strong>of</strong> the people who leave comments here and debate the<br />

usability and quality <strong>of</strong> today's printers are Pro or Simi-Pro, and that they are<br />

comparing the printers to high quality photography film and printing processes.<br />

There are a few things that I would like to throw out there for your consideration.<br />

● First - That the quality <strong>of</strong> the printed image has, in a large part, more to do<br />

with the quality <strong>of</strong> the digital image source than does the printer. For<br />

example, the digital camera used to take the original image can have a<br />

http://www.photo.net/equipment/digital/printers/primer (24 <strong>of</strong> 36)7/3/2005 2:20:36 AM

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!