13.12.2012 Views

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Exposure<br />

When using a reflected light meter, the most important source <strong>of</strong> error is<br />

that the subject's reflectance may not match the meter's assumption about<br />

the subject's reflectance. Suppose that you're taking individual portraits <strong>of</strong><br />

Alex and Mia (at right). You measure the light being reflected <strong>of</strong>f Alex's<br />

white fur and set the camera to whatever the meter recommends. Repeating<br />

the image with Mia as the subject you find that much less light is reflected<br />

by her black and brown fur. So the reflected light meter recommends a<br />

wider aperture or a slower shutter speed than it did for Alex.<br />

Does this make sense? With negative film, perhaps. Mia is darker and if you want to get her tones into the linear<br />

portion <strong>of</strong> the film's curve you'll need a longer exposure. But consider that if you'd used an incident light meter it<br />

would have recommended the same exposure for both dogs. After all, the same amount <strong>of</strong> light was falling on<br />

them. If you'd used color slide film and the incident meter's recommendation you'd get one slide with a white dog<br />

in it and one slide with a black dog in it. What if you'd used the reflected meter's recommendation with the slide<br />

film? You'd get two slides exposed with an identical amount <strong>of</strong> light and therefore both would be the same shade.<br />

Exactly what shade do you get when you follow a reflective meter's recommendation? 18% gray. This is a tone<br />

midway between 0% gray (white) and 100% gray (black). Reflected meters are calibrated to assume that the<br />

average scene is 18% gray. The reflected meter couldn't know that Alex is a white dog and that Mia is a black<br />

dog. When you pointed it at Alex it assumed that the day had gotten brighter. When you pointed it at Mia it<br />

assumed that the sky had become cloudier.<br />

Is this 18% gray assumption reasonable? If you take portraits <strong>of</strong> Caucasian people and meter <strong>of</strong>f their facial skin<br />

you'll probably find that your slides come out a bit too dark. Typical Caucasian skin is about 1/2 f-stop lighter<br />

than 18% gray. So the reflected meter thinks that the subject is lit somewhat brighter than in reality.<br />

Here are some examples:<br />

http://www.photo.net/making-photographs/exposure (10 <strong>of</strong> 13)7/3/2005 2:22:14 AM<br />

A dream scene! All roughly the same tone. All<br />

roughly 18% gray. (from Italy)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!