13.12.2012 Views

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Color Printers<br />

in sequence so dust may move around the page between layers.<br />

I'll test out the longevity as soon as I get a chance, but I left some prints in my car's<br />

rear window by accident. In the week they were there they were apparently<br />

unaffected. They were also unaffected by some hot c<strong>of</strong>fee I spilled on them..<br />

-- George Pang, August 10, 1998<br />

I looked at the printer market in the $500 and under range about one year ago and<br />

settled on the HP PhotoSmart, which at that time sold for $500.<br />

Today that same printer goes for $400. BUT! there is another HP printer, the<br />

HP720 or HP722 which sells for around $300 and can match the performance <strong>of</strong><br />

the PhotoSmart, when using the Glossy Photo HP paper.<br />

The cost <strong>of</strong> a print is $0.80 for the photo paper and $0.80 for the ink, for 8"x10"<br />

prints on 8.5x11 paper.<br />

The print quality is excellent, difficult to distinguish from a "real" photo at normal<br />

viewing distances for a photo that size. HP does not rate the printer for dot pitch,<br />

since the photo paper reacts with the ink to "meld" the printed pixels as the ink<br />

spreads into the paper coating, it doesn't make sense to speak <strong>of</strong> dot pitch.<br />

Kodak makes a photo paper that costs about half the HP paper. I have not tried it<br />

yet.<br />

-- Dave Conrad, August 29, 1998<br />

I've had an Epson Photo EX for a few months now. I love it! I do some electronic<br />

art and some more photo retouching. The colors are smooth and it provides good<br />

contrast and excelent sharpness. I've had some digital images transfered to slides<br />

then printed and the results were exactly the same except that I was in control <strong>of</strong><br />

the process. I had some initially dissapointing results when I scanned in some black<br />

and white prints for enlarging. There wasn't enough detail in the shadows. This was<br />

a probably a result <strong>of</strong> my reasonably priced 30 bit flatbed scanner. Some tweaking<br />

in photoshop however rectified the problem. Some <strong>of</strong> the work I've taken to<br />

framing shops has gotten good comments.<br />

-- Tom Menegatos, September 11, 1998<br />

I have a PowerMacintosh, an Agfa Snapscan 600 scanner and an Epson Stylus<br />

Photo 700 printer. The results? Good, very good for a relatively cheap system. I<br />

http://www.photo.net/equipment/digital/printers/primer (10 <strong>of</strong> 36)7/3/2005 2:20:36 AM

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!