13.12.2012 Views

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Street Photography<br />

picture could have been taken by a vegetarian who hates fish. The fruit lady in Costa Rica would<br />

possibly not like her picture taken like this from behind. And the young lady on the steps has no more<br />

expression than the plurality <strong>of</strong> dogs in most <strong>of</strong> the pictures. Strangely enough, sometimes I felt these<br />

photos demonstrate "Dogs in Street Photography" instead <strong>of</strong> individuals in daily life.<br />

BUT: I do like three <strong>of</strong> the pictures, actually Phil at his best. The nuns and monks along with that<br />

American (?) tourist with a funny hat behind the lady with a cell phone in Jerusalem, the twin<br />

newspapers in Tokyo subway and, best <strong>of</strong> all, the man reading newspaper in Dublin. If this one were in<br />

black and white, we would have missed the colour <strong>of</strong> his tie!<br />

-- George D. Gianni, November 30, 2000<br />

I'd like to add that I too take a lot <strong>of</strong> random photos on a daily basis. I started with Canon EOS cameras<br />

then switched to the Canon Digital Powershot 20 and now also use the Canon G1 with telephoto lens.<br />

Digital makes it so much cheaper and incites me to more experimentation. I mount the G1 on my car<br />

window mount from Bogen and use the remote to shoot while I'm driving. The car in essence is the<br />

viewfinder and I find myself circling the block or making uturns for better light or shooting angles. (No<br />

accidents or near misses yet!) The remote allows me to zoom and shift shooting modes and the G1<br />

accepts the EOS external flashes! Give it a try! It also works in a daypack or briefcase.<br />

-- t. bomba, December 2, 2000<br />

This is turning into an interesting discussion. I can see both sides. I remember before I got into<br />

photography a young lady "mugged" me with her camera. I was fishing for musky, and looked the part.<br />

She was trying to be a street photographer, trying to take a candid shot, and I caught her. I scolded her,<br />

too, and when she defended herself with, "well, you're in a public place", I really scolded her. But now<br />

that I have picked up an interest in photography, and have looked at images, I like seeing candid shots <strong>of</strong><br />

people. And I like it when the people don't seem to notice the camera (hence the word candid, I guess).<br />

Not that a candid shot requires anonymity, but many <strong>of</strong> the best street shots I have seen appeared to be<br />

taken candidly and anonymously. Just my opinion, which has changed over the years. Getting to know<br />

your subject first sometimes helps, but sometimes random shots <strong>of</strong> strangers yeilds good results, too.<br />

-- Mike Morgan, December 3, 2000<br />

For another perspective on street photography (actually subway photog.) see http://www.davebeckerman.<br />

com/ and click on the article "Photography on the subway." I like his writing and love his photos.<br />

In addition, Jeff Spirer, a regular <strong>of</strong> this phot.net community, has some excellent stuff at www.spirer.<br />

com.<br />

No <strong>of</strong>fense to Phil, but the work <strong>of</strong> those guys is what I think <strong>of</strong> when I think <strong>of</strong> street photography. As<br />

mentioned by others, I favor the B&W aesthetic for this type <strong>of</strong> photography.<br />

http://www.photo.net/photo/street-photography (11 <strong>of</strong> 31)7/3/2005 2:18:44 AM

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!