13.12.2012 Views

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Street Photography<br />

at close quarters , with the subjects full knowledge and (I would judge) the subjects dignity is totally<br />

preserved!.....<br />

http://www.orst.edu/dept/humanities/newsletter/2000-spring/images/lambeth-walk.jpg<br />

-- Trevor Hare, August 1, 2002<br />

As to what I do with all my street photos. I just have lots <strong>of</strong> negatives archived in folders. I dont print<br />

everything. Much <strong>of</strong> what I have on photo.net is scanned negatives. I sometimes will see someone I have<br />

taken a photo <strong>of</strong> in passing and give them a card to contact me, I give them a print as my own payment<br />

back to them (thats nothing for I have taken there image and If I show anyone and its anygood, thats<br />

promotion leading to more money for me so why not?) I have heard street photography described as "the<br />

stolen art" This is why I tend not to take pictures <strong>of</strong> the deprived for I see little point in exploiting. And<br />

when I have, I give them money, a lunch or a dinner for the guy laying in the street drooling/ starving /<br />

drunk, that someone photographs then posts here for self agrandisement gets none <strong>of</strong> that glory if hes<br />

half smiling or not.<br />

-- Babatunde Martins, August 2, 2002<br />

It seems a more apropos name for this subsection would be "guerilla photography" since the nature <strong>of</strong><br />

the subject matter is almost a mystery until it's encountered. Furthermore, I understand the other readers<br />

who note that the flash is present in the picture. My concern is based on this. How can you truly catch<br />

people unawares using a flash in public? Don't they notice things like that? And do you have to get<br />

releases from them if you decide to exhibit or sell their likenesses?<br />

-- thomas scott, November 24, 2002<br />

In the end using flash or not will only make an impact on your standing once you have taken the photo.<br />

Using the flash will obviously draw attention altering the living aspect <strong>of</strong> any images past the first click.<br />

Not using flash may give you more chances at capturing the slice <strong>of</strong> life without the blast intrusion <strong>of</strong><br />

flash. It all depends on how you wish to be in your environment. Do you want to document or become a<br />

part <strong>of</strong> it? It will show in the images. Personally I think that street photography turns quickly into<br />

outdoor studio candid portrature when flash is introduced.<br />

-- Babatunde Martins, April 15, 2003<br />

> Maybe this is why Bill Brandt is a legend and Phil isnt<br />

This sounded like a very cynical comment itself. Legend or not, from what I know is, despite your<br />

disagreement with Phil, I won't be into photography today, if it wasn't for Phil. So, please give him a<br />

credit. I believe his contibution in making photography knowledge available online/public for free is<br />

undeniable.<br />

http://www.photo.net/photo/street-photography (19 <strong>of</strong> 31)7/3/2005 2:18:44 AM

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!