13.12.2012 Views

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Tripods<br />

cement FLOOR -- the tripod was unscathed: no bangs, chips, nothing. No loss,<br />

although now I have to patch and repaint the floor.<br />

4) Costly (for those on a limited budget)? Shop around! I got a great after-<br />

Christmas deal at cameraworld.com (Cameraworld <strong>of</strong> Oregon) -- 15% <strong>of</strong>f, no<br />

shipping charges and no tax. Deals can be had if you're patient.<br />

In sum: I do not hesitate to recommend this tripod, and thank previous posters for<br />

their helpful advice. --tom<br />

-- Thomas Munch, January 7, 2000<br />

For those agonizing over spending money on a tripod and head, this is for you.<br />

There is little glamor associated with camera support, but it is a major factor in the<br />

quality <strong>of</strong> your final image. I've been through a lot <strong>of</strong> lousy tripods because I was<br />

too concerned with getting that sexy new lens which will gaurantee great results...<br />

well, the best lens in the world will produce s<strong>of</strong>t images unless it is FIRMLY<br />

attatched to a SOLID tripod. The hard fact is your tripod is an essential component<br />

<strong>of</strong> your gear and I highly advise you cough up the money for a good one! Don't get<br />

sucked into thinking a $75 wobbly pan and tilt head will suffice, if you are a<br />

serious photographer then grit your teeth and buy the Arca Swiss B1, put it on a<br />

substantial tripod, lock down the camera, lock up the mirror, and shoot only under<br />

these conditions! Sure the Arca is expensive, but it is a lifetime investment, a joy to<br />

work with, and far superior to any pan head. I know this because I have tried to<br />

scrimp and ended up paying the price in terms <strong>of</strong> image quality and performance.<br />

PS get a plate from Really Right Stuff-essential. I welcome comments. Check out<br />

my site Perspectivesphoto.com<br />

-- alan hoelzle, January 16, 2000<br />

I've been using the Kirk Ballhead on a Manfrotto 3221 for a couple <strong>of</strong> years now. I<br />

also have a big Foba Ballo on a Gitzo 320. I ordered the Kirk with a separate quick<br />

release clamp. (I prefer the flexibility.) It has worked flawlessly in all sorts <strong>of</strong><br />

conditions. It is strong enough for my Canon system including a 100-400 with a 2x<br />

extender. I've also used it with a Pentax 645 up to the 300mm + 1.4x. This lens has<br />

no collar and exerts considerable force on the tripod & head. I don't own the really<br />

big prime telephoto lenses. It's not as strong as the Foba, but it weighs about half as<br />

much. It is more than adequate for these combinations and perhaps even a bit<br />

heavier. It's a pleasure to use, smooth even tension, locks down and releases easily.<br />

As with the other Kirk products I have used, it seems nearly perfect. I enjoy dealing<br />

with Kirk & company. They are pleasant and responsive and seem to genuinely<br />

http://www.photo.net/equipment/tripods/philg (33 <strong>of</strong> 53)7/3/2005 2:21:13 AM

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!