13.12.2012 Views

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Camera and Equipment Insurance<br />

this clearly in mind if you decide to go this route.<br />

-- Marika Buchberger, August 11, 2000<br />

I live in Vancouver, BC, Canada, a great city albeit one with one <strong>of</strong> the largest hard drug<br />

user populations in the western world. When you have a large group <strong>of</strong> addicts around<br />

you’ll realize they need a lot <strong>of</strong> money to support their habits. Two weeks ago my<br />

beloved GR1s and a T90 were ripped <strong>of</strong>f when my apartment was broken into. I consider<br />

myself lucky...this is the first equipment loss I’ve had in 25 years. Since then I’ve tried to<br />

get all risk insurance to cover the $20K worth <strong>of</strong> equipment I use (as an amateur)...no<br />

luck: either the premiums are to high or I’m laughed out <strong>of</strong> the <strong>of</strong>fice. Phil how about<br />

trying to organize some kind <strong>of</strong> policy in Canada....Anyone else: do you insure in BC?<br />

With whom? Thanks Jim<br />

-- Jim Vanson, September 21, 2000<br />

Jim, if you use your gear for personal use only, a standard tenant or homeowner's policy<br />

will cover it. Just watch for what the perils you are insured against are, and check to see<br />

if there's an <strong>of</strong>f-premises limit.<br />

I'm an insurance broker in Regina, Saskatchewan (Canada), and the carrier I've chosen to<br />

insure my home has no <strong>of</strong>f-premises limit on personal property. I pay a $500 deductible,<br />

but given the value <strong>of</strong> my gear, that's okay.<br />

-- Jim MacKenzie, September 28, 2000<br />

If insurance is an issue with you NANPA members have an insurer who writes<br />

Commercial Inland Marine Policies for members. I assume that there is a lower rate for<br />

NANPA members. I found that my homeowners insurance limits would not come near<br />

covering a major equipment loss even if I didn't have related income. This policy is all<br />

risk and covers me in most foreign countries. The NANPA website is www.nanpa.org<br />

-- John Pickles, December 10, 2000<br />

My Insurance Company will list camera equipment in excess <strong>of</strong> 200.00 as scheduled<br />

items on my homeowner's policy. Items with a value less then 200.00 default to my<br />

standard homeowner coverage. This coverage is not as good as a scheduled item.<br />

Now, I have a lot <strong>of</strong> "stuff" with a unit price less than 200.00 when added together would<br />

be a great loss to me. Am I being too picky here or is there another way to insure my<br />

equipment?<br />

-- Michael R. Amodeo, February 16, 2001<br />

http://www.photo.net/learn/insurance (10 <strong>of</strong> 12) [5/15/2002 7:16:03 PM]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!