13.12.2012 Views

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Color Printers<br />

I have a HP720 inkjet printer w/ PhotoRETII. It's basically a inkjet that works with<br />

a color layering system that improves halftones. Using HP Deluxe Photo paper, I<br />

could fool almost everyone. Its output is comparable to Kodak ImageMagic, and at<br />

a fraction <strong>of</strong> the cost. The printer itself is cheap, around $250 in the US, and the<br />

paper costs around $.80 per letter-sized sheet. Definitely a good solution for the<br />

average man. Also it's a fairly versatile printer, so you wouldn't commit your bucks<br />

on a photo-only printer. The only drawback: it's a PPA printer - that means it works<br />

with specialized HP drivers, that are only available to Windows and Mac OS -<br />

Linux guys will have to settle for a nonsupported driver that only produces blackand-white<br />

output.<br />

-- George Gaspari, April 24, 1999<br />

Regarding the HP720 inkjet printer w/ PhotoRETII using HP Deluxe Photo paper<br />

SOLUTION (!). The results have nothing to do with photo quality printing. I really<br />

can t understand how one can fool anybody with these printers. Same comment for<br />

HP 890C w/ Kodak Image Enhancements<br />

-- Dan Georgescu, May 8, 1999<br />

I've had both the HP 722 and the Epson Stylus Photo EX. The Epson easily handles<br />

halftones better then the HP. It is most noticable (in my experience) in pictures <strong>of</strong><br />

the sky during sunset. The Epson is as close to Photgraphic quality as I've seen<br />

from an ink jet.<br />

Apparently the Fujix 4000 has the best digital output, but I haven't seen the output<br />

myself ro form an opinion.<br />

-- David Kim, May 31, 1999<br />

Let me tell you the Epson 740 color stylus is the best printer I have experience. Dye<br />

printer sucks to me, they do give out good quality photos but come on who is going<br />

to spend $3000 bucks for a printer when the print are not archival. I print all my<br />

prints at 1440 dpi and they come out with photographic quality prints they look as<br />

close a looking at a picture they have this technology called Micro Piezo which is<br />

awesome when it comes to printing at 1440 dpi. Believe me I will give a few more<br />

years for Epson to come up with a ink jet printer that will print as good as a dye or<br />

even better.<br />

-- Tony Torres, June 25, 1999<br />

I have been playing around with an Epson Stylus Photo 700 for the last few days at<br />

http://www.photo.net/equipment/digital/printers/primer (16 <strong>of</strong> 36)7/3/2005 2:20:36 AM

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!