13.12.2012 Views

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Tripods<br />

sleeves make the top one the tightest if you use about the same force on all 3 locks<br />

and it works beautifully.)<br />

Note that RRS is under new ownership and also has significantly upgraded its<br />

products, as well as being (so far) a bit more user friendly. Acratech is also now<br />

making plates, although not as wide a selection as the RRS range.<br />

-- Charles Mackay, May 15, 2003<br />

There are pr<strong>of</strong>essional ball heads made by a company called Markins... There is<br />

supposed to be one model, the M10 that has comparable stats to the Arca-Swiss B1,<br />

but for lower cost. Has anyone had any experience with these ball heads?<br />

http://www.markins.com/2.0/eng/products/ballheads/m10.html<br />

thanks,<br />

Yong<br />

-- Yong Pong, January 8, 2004<br />

Studio stands ain't that expensive. I bought a three meter high Plaubel ST10/6<br />

studio stand from (I think) the seventies for 151€. Where? On ebay! Okay, it's not<br />

in a fancy and modern black, but at 60+ kilos and locking mechanisms for all<br />

available movements, it's a wonderful piece <strong>of</strong> equipment, easily surpassing<br />

anything else in stability and ease <strong>of</strong> use. If studio photography is your thing, that<br />

is. Forget about new, at 2k€ new they're beyond the scope <strong>of</strong> the very dedicated<br />

amateuer. But then, which amateur wouldn't rather spend that kind <strong>of</strong> money on a<br />

fancy lens? Why are they so cheap, used? Because <strong>of</strong> their weight and size. So If<br />

you have the ability to pick it up with your own car, you can get a wonderful<br />

"little" helper in obtaining better images. I can't count the times I had a hassle with<br />

my old Linh<strong>of</strong> tripod, getting a decent shot from somewhere above the subject, not<br />

talking about rapid changes in height or camera positioning.<br />

One more thing, any tripod without a spreader is completely useless, especially<br />

those which allow you to put the legs at different angles. This tiny piece <strong>of</strong><br />

equipment will increase the structural stability immensely, I can't understand why<br />

someone buys a tripod without one and then dares to complain. I personally like the<br />

spreaders which attach to the middle, some people prefer the variant, which is fixed<br />

to the feet <strong>of</strong> the tripod. Check out this link, maybe a picture makes it clearer:<br />

http://www.manfrotto.com/product/templates/templates.php3?<br />

http://www.photo.net/equipment/tripods/philg (50 <strong>of</strong> 53)7/3/2005 2:21:13 AM

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!