13.12.2012 Views

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Street Photography<br />

-- James Gleeson, August 20, 2001<br />

An interesting discussion. Its all subjective - either you like the work or you don't. I've photographed<br />

both candid and interactive shots <strong>of</strong> people from Brazil to India to China. Sometimes candid is<br />

appropriate, sometimes its not. But if you don't shoot, you won't have a photo. It looks like what<br />

everyone is discussing is the definition <strong>of</strong> street photography - my question is, is there one and does it<br />

matter?<br />

The links that other comments recommended are great!<br />

-- Eric Riutort, December 2, 2001<br />

A comment on Trevor Hare's November 29, 2000 entry: He says: "Sorry but I do not feel this page<br />

demonstrates street photography. The images mostly look as if taken with telephoto lenses. (Shyness or<br />

cowardice?)..." He prefers to use "a Normal lenses so the photographer had to interact with his fellow<br />

humans..."<br />

On the contrary, interacting with the subject can <strong>of</strong>ten disrupt the candidness <strong>of</strong> the shot. Real life<br />

changes abruptly when the subject is acutely aware that he is being photographed.<br />

Trevor adds: "Also when photographing poverty try and preserve the subjects dignity...". I agree totally,<br />

and to do just that, a distant shot <strong>of</strong>ten seems more appropriate to me. How can a down and out person's<br />

dignity be preserved when a photographer is in his face saying, in effect, "let me take your picture<br />

because you are so deprived."? Cowardice to take a shot from a distance? I think it can be a sign <strong>of</strong> true<br />

respect. ---B<br />

-- Brian Sharkey, January 11, 2002<br />

Some <strong>of</strong> the best street/candid photography shots can be seen from "Life" magazine.. Here, I like the<br />

shot "Canal Street Manhattan 1995".<br />

-- Belinda Tan, January 16, 2002<br />

I find it very interesting that more hasn't been said about people and their right not to be photographed. I<br />

consider myself a very serious amateur. I enjoy photographing just about everything and have had a<br />

considerable amount <strong>of</strong> formal art training at the University <strong>of</strong> South Florida as well as technical<br />

photography training at the Art Institute <strong>of</strong> Fort Lauderdale. The moral and legal issues <strong>of</strong><br />

photographing people against their wishes intrigues me.<br />

It is my personal opinion that everyone (excluding people who knowing place themselves in the public<br />

eye) has the right to determine how and when their image is used. The justification that an image is art<br />

or that the image could not have been captured in any other way should not be the justification for a<br />

http://www.photo.net/photo/street-photography (17 <strong>of</strong> 31)7/3/2005 2:18:44 AM

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!