13.12.2012 Views

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Color Printers<br />

The Epson is a large unit, and takes up a lot <strong>of</strong> desk space. Cartridges are only 2/3<br />

the price <strong>of</strong> the Lexmark, but I do not suspect that they will last overly long. The<br />

bundled 'quality images' are a waste <strong>of</strong> space, and if you like Adobe photoshop<br />

elements, you can have my copy! For a serious printer, I would have thought it<br />

would have had something a little more heavyweight, but that is just my opinion.<br />

If you expect to install it straight out <strong>of</strong> the box you will be very disappointed....No<br />

USB, or other cable supplied with mine, and none stated as supplied in the<br />

instructions...worse still, absence <strong>of</strong> same not mentioned on the box so far as I can<br />

see.<br />

Well, there it is, for what it is worth.....It prints <strong>of</strong>f some very nice images,<br />

exceedingly well, and quickly in A3 size at max resolution...I didnt time them, but<br />

it was quicker than my Lexmark doing the same print in the smaller A4 size.....<br />

Check out the competition, as these A3 printers are becoming more readily<br />

available at a reasonably affordable price....I paid £349 UK in March 2002, from<br />

PC World, but know I could have bought it cheaper over the web. I just like the<br />

ease <strong>of</strong> solving any problems, for which I'm prepared to pay that little extra. Happy<br />

hunting and Printing... Graeme Pettit<br />

-- Graeme Pettit, April 29, 2002<br />

I recently went to a demonstration <strong>of</strong> the Epson Stylus Pro 7600 (24") and the 9600<br />

(44"). You can now get fine art, large print quality on a reasonably priced machine.<br />

The quality <strong>of</strong> a 16x20 from a 35mm scan was unbeleivable! The only<br />

improvements to be made in the coming years will be speed. These machines<br />

output 16sqft / hour for photographic quality - that's approx 10 min for a 16x20.<br />

The prints are also archival to 100 yrs.. I print fine art prints up to 40x50" from 4x5<br />

transparencies and would never have considered printing digitally till now. I could<br />

write for days on the subject but you can get more precise info @ Epson's site.<br />

Tangentially to this forum: Also, check out the Imacon Flextight Precision II & III<br />

scanners - still around $10K but scanning the quality <strong>of</strong> some drum scanners that<br />

cost 3 times as much!<br />

-- John Hanses, August 25, 2002<br />

The new Giclee printers are phenominal. If you have an opportunity to print<br />

selected digitized images using the Giclee process, it is well worth it.<br />

-- Fab Mastronardi, September 22, 2002<br />

http://www.photo.net/equipment/digital/printers/primer (32 <strong>of</strong> 36)7/3/2005 2:20:36 AM

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!