13.12.2012 Views

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Color Printers<br />

this group, I was especially impressed by how close the printed colors were to those<br />

on the monitor (I only had to fiddle a little bit with the brightness, reducing it in<br />

Photoshop by 15 points). By the way, I was using a Power Mac G3. I think Macs<br />

are usually better in color reproduction on the monitor than PC's...<br />

-- Victor Grubsky, October 6, 1999<br />

I've been using the HP Photosmart printer for over a year with excellent results, but<br />

lately I've grown frustrated with its maximum 8 1/2 X 11 inch size. I've avoided<br />

Epson printers because their inks are not as lightfast as HP's. But I've recently<br />

learned that several independent vendors are supplying inks, some pigment-based,<br />

for the $499 Epson Stylus Photo 1200 printer, which prints up to 13 X 19 inches--<br />

large enough for my scanned 35mm images. Some relevant websites:<br />

http://www.mediastreet.com/<br />

http://www.tssphoto.com/sp/dg/archival_inks.html#fotonic<br />

http://www.weink.com/scart/inkjets/epson/endura/specinks.htm<br />

I'm considering buying the Epson 1200, and I would appreciate comments from<br />

anyone with experience with these new inks. How do they look? What are the color<br />

management issues (colors are apparently somewhat different from standard Epson<br />

inks)? Are there any problems with ink jet clogging? What kinds <strong>of</strong> paper work<br />

best? Have any good articles been published?<br />

These new inks could be a really important breakthrough, and deserve urgent<br />

attention.<br />

-- Norman Koren<br />

-- Norman Koren, October 24, 1999<br />

I've owned an Epson Stylus Photo 1200 for a little over a month, working with<br />

negatives and slides scanned with a Minolta QuickScan 35 Plus. The prints I've<br />

made so far (up to 11x17"; haven't tried 13x19" yet) have been mightily impressive<br />

- I had planned to use the 1200 principally for portfolio and work prints (no regular<br />

access to a darkroom - raise your hand if you're in a similar situation), but I<br />

wouldn't be ashamed to use the printer for a need-to-be-quick-about-it presentation<br />

or small exhibit. The two minor caveats I would raise to prospective buyers <strong>of</strong> the<br />

1200 are: 1) On account <strong>of</strong> the 1200 being so recently brought to market, archivalquality<br />

color inks aren't yet available for it. Several companies - including Epson<br />

itself - are working on such inks (Quadtone inks are already available for the 1200,<br />

I've been told); 2) Generally speaking, the bigger the file size, the better the print,<br />

http://www.photo.net/equipment/digital/printers/primer (18 <strong>of</strong> 36)7/3/2005 2:20:36 AM

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!