13.12.2012 Views

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Cleaning Cameras<br />

On a separate note, as per Keppler's recommendation in Pop Photo, I went to Adorama and<br />

bought the Microdear cloth, and found it to work very well.<br />

Alex Karasev<br />

-- Alexander Karasev, June 30, 1999<br />

I also noticed the slight swirls you get when using ROR, but it seemed to work well overall<br />

for cleaning. I just used it to clean a Canon 70-200 2.8 and a Sigma 170-500. After a year<br />

<strong>of</strong> taking the Sigma to the racetrack for horse racing photography, the lens' front element<br />

was so fouled with sand, dust, oil, etc that I was about to give up on it. Regular cleaning<br />

products like canned air and micr<strong>of</strong>iber cloths did nothing to help it. After one ROR<br />

treatment, it was good as new! ROR even took <strong>of</strong>f moisture spots that had appeared on the<br />

front coating. Sure ROR left a slight swirling pattern (only noticeable when viewed at an<br />

angle under flourescent light), but after some buffing with the micr<strong>of</strong>iber cloth the swirls<br />

were pretty much gone.<br />

-- Derek Dammann, July 16, 1999<br />

A further comment on lens cleaners; since my last posting, I discovered a way to eliminate<br />

the greasy swirls that mysteriously appeared on my lens elements after a treatment with<br />

ROR. I have found that if you saturate a cotton facial pad with ROR, apply the liquid<br />

thickly to glass, and then immediately remove it with another dry pad, the swirls are<br />

eliminated or at least reduced to a degree at which a light buffing will remove them.<br />

The literature on Residual Oil Remover makes mention that certain tissues are "not<br />

absorbant enough for ROR..." My theory is, that since ROR apparently emulsifies oil, too<br />

much wiping simply redeposits the oil back on the glass. This is a somewhat half-assed<br />

explaination, and I'm not entirely convinced <strong>of</strong> its merit. What I am convinced <strong>of</strong> is that<br />

ROR seems a bit to fickle to warrant wasting my time with. I use others cleaners that work<br />

better. I would also ask if Phil has experinced any <strong>of</strong> the aforementioned difficulties, and, if<br />

so, could he please place a posting illustrating his solution. I would be interested in hearing<br />

additional insight.<br />

A final observation on Kodak lens cleaner. Reading the Contents label illustrates that it is<br />

simply ammonia diluted with water. I have <strong>of</strong>ten heard that ammonia is harsher on lens<br />

coatings than ethyl alcohol, and to my experience, does not work as well. (I use an alcohol<br />

based cleaner.) Does anyone have any insight here? Phil says that the New Zealander who<br />

extracted the glass fragments from his lens cleaned the glass with acetone, something I<br />

would never consider. Any comments?<br />

-- Timothy Breihan, August 24, 1999<br />

http://www.photo.net/learn/cleaning-cameras (8 <strong>of</strong> 19) [5/15/2002 7:15:53 PM]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!