13.12.2012 Views

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

Reader's Comments - Index of - Free

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Portrait Photography<br />

-- shiv s, February 26, 1999<br />

I can only agree with Shiv S. Though a 2.8/80-200 zoom is indeed huge and heavy, it gives the freedom <strong>of</strong><br />

getting closer to and getting further away from your subject without moving from the spot you're standing. Apart<br />

from the thus gained advantage <strong>of</strong> speed when trying to catch spontanious moment in just the right frame, I find<br />

it a huge advantage that, e.g. when working with a inexperienced model, you don't have to run around the place<br />

to get a close up or a medium or three-quarter shot, and thus avoid unsettling the model with the unrest otherwise<br />

created.<br />

-- Paul Koster, March 23, 1999<br />

I agree with Paul Koster. I recently purchased the Nikon 80-200 f2.8 D ( non S ), and it as sharp as my 135 f2.<br />

This is an amazing lens and it provides for great flexability. Although heavy, it's well worth it. Portraits have a<br />

great look. Give it a try, you will be amazed.<br />

Mark Tuccillo<br />

-- Mark Tuccillo, March 29, 1999<br />

Hi,<br />

Before I got my Canon, I was using a Nikkormat with a 50mm lens. Check out my photographs at http://www.<br />

tanchung.com.<br />

All my recent shots are done on a Canon EOS 28-105mm at the longer end. Tell me whether you can see the<br />

difference in quality. Except for the fact that the photos on my website are a little small, you can't really spot any<br />

difference.<br />

I agree with Philip that I want my original shots to be sharp and if I want some parts to be blurred, etc, I can<br />

always touch them up in Photoshop later.<br />

My point in showing you the comparison: it is not the lens/camera/film that counts but the eye.<br />

-- Tan Chung, April 8, 1999<br />

I do "environmental" portraits, where the subject is in their natural environment. After all, the point <strong>of</strong> a portrait<br />

is to reveal something about the subject. That's why I find most plain background studio shots sterile. It's always<br />

a struggle deciding how much <strong>of</strong> the background to include. Usually the old rule applies: less is more. The face<br />

usually says it all.<br />

http://www.accesshub.net/naturalight/PEOPLE/People.htm<br />

-- George Struk, May 18, 1999<br />

http://www.photo.net/portraits/intro (12 <strong>of</strong> 37)7/3/2005 2:16:41 AM

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!