06.02.2013 Views

Research in Engineering Education Symposium 2011 - rees2009

Research in Engineering Education Symposium 2011 - rees2009

Research in Engineering Education Symposium 2011 - rees2009

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM) Pág<strong>in</strong>a 100 de 957<br />

Table 2: Items of Beliefs about Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g Knowledge and Know<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Ontological Beliefs: Beliefs about the Nature of Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Reality<br />

Ontological beliefs are def<strong>in</strong>ed as beliefs about the nature of reality. Several studies have<br />

exam<strong>in</strong>ed ontological beliefs us<strong>in</strong>g qualitative methods, such as th<strong>in</strong>k-alouds, <strong>in</strong>terview<br />

techniques, and content analysis of verbal explanations (Slotta & Chi, 2006, Gupta et al.,<br />

2010; Hammer et al., <strong>2011</strong>). In this paper, we beg<strong>in</strong> with the def<strong>in</strong>ition of ontological<br />

beliefs by assum<strong>in</strong>g that each type of belief exists on a cont<strong>in</strong>uum that ranges from realist<br />

to relativist endpo<strong>in</strong>ts. Realism refers to the fact that entities or phenomena (e.g.<br />

knowledge) exist and can be understood and expla<strong>in</strong>ed to some degree, even though<br />

experts do not understand that phenomenon. Idealism asserts that entities may exist <strong>in</strong> an<br />

everchang<strong>in</strong>g manner (e.g. the chang<strong>in</strong>g nature of human rights), or that we can never<br />

know with certa<strong>in</strong>ty whether someth<strong>in</strong>g exists. In educational sett<strong>in</strong>gs, a realist educator<br />

would be more likely to assume a universal curriculum, as one underly<strong>in</strong>g reality that is<br />

transmitted to students via a knowledgeable teacher regardless of students' <strong>in</strong>dividual<br />

circumstances and context. An idealist educator would be more likely to assume that<br />

different people have different realities. From this perspective, while each student<br />

constructs knowledge, a teacher can play a role of collaborator, co-participant, and<br />

facilitator to meet the <strong>in</strong>dividual needs of students (Schraw & Olafson, 2002). Consider<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the natural problem solv<strong>in</strong>g culture of eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g, pragmatism can also be discussed as a<br />

method that welcomes multiple approaches <strong>in</strong> design<strong>in</strong>g and test<strong>in</strong>g solutions rather than<br />

requir<strong>in</strong>g rigid adherence to a s<strong>in</strong>gle ontological paradigm. In a sense then, we have added<br />

a radical position, as an ontologically neutral position assigned between realism and<br />

relativism as polar opposites on the cont<strong>in</strong>uum with respect to the role of reality (Ernest,<br />

Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of <strong>Research</strong> <strong>in</strong> Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Education</strong> <strong>Symposium</strong> <strong>2011</strong><br />

Madrid, 4 th - 7 th October <strong>2011</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!