06.02.2013 Views

Research in Engineering Education Symposium 2011 - rees2009

Research in Engineering Education Symposium 2011 - rees2009

Research in Engineering Education Symposium 2011 - rees2009

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM) Pág<strong>in</strong>a 672 de 957<br />

<strong>Research</strong> Context<br />

This research and development project was funded <strong>in</strong> 2009 by the Australian Learn<strong>in</strong>g<br />

and Teach<strong>in</strong>g Council, <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g 5 <strong>in</strong>stitutions: CQUniversity (Australia), Aalborg<br />

University (Denmark), Sw<strong>in</strong>burne Institute of Technology (Australia), Victoria University<br />

(Australia), and University of Melbourne (Australia). Each of these <strong>in</strong>stitutions offers<br />

team-based eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g subjects. For CQUniversity, Aalborg University, and Victoria<br />

University, these subjects are offered with<strong>in</strong> a larger project-based learn<strong>in</strong>g approach, the<br />

configuration of which varies across the universities. For Sw<strong>in</strong>burne Institute of<br />

Technology and University of Melbourne, team-based subjects are offered ad hoc and<br />

accord<strong>in</strong>g to the <strong>in</strong>terests of <strong>in</strong>dividual academic staff. By comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g these vary<strong>in</strong>g<br />

contexts, the research team hoped to ga<strong>in</strong> a more <strong>in</strong>clusive and nuanced perspective on<br />

both the assessment context <strong>in</strong> team-based subjects and possible solutions that would<br />

work across these contexts.<br />

Methodologies and Methods<br />

The <strong>in</strong>itial overarch<strong>in</strong>g question driv<strong>in</strong>g this research project was deceptively simple:<br />

What comb<strong>in</strong>ation of teach<strong>in</strong>g practices can effectively assess <strong>in</strong>dividual student learn<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong> team-based subjects? In order to <strong>in</strong>vestigate this question, the research team devised a<br />

staged research anddevelopment design:<br />

1. Conceptual model development. This stage <strong>in</strong>volved data collection and analysis,<br />

engagement with the literature, and reflective dialogue and writ<strong>in</strong>g by the<br />

research to construct an <strong>in</strong>itial conceptual model of effective assessment of<br />

<strong>in</strong>dividual students who are learn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> teams.<br />

2. Development of the strategic assessment framework. Based on the conceptual<br />

model, the research team has developed an assessment framework (teach<strong>in</strong>g<br />

practices and artefacts) that can support academic staff <strong>in</strong> assess<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dividual<br />

students strategically with<strong>in</strong> a s<strong>in</strong>gle subject.<br />

3. Implementation and evaluation of the assessment framework and<br />

conceptual model. The f<strong>in</strong>al stages of the project, which are currently underway,<br />

<strong>in</strong>volves implement<strong>in</strong>g the framework with academic staff participants at four<br />

Australian universities and gather<strong>in</strong>g data which can assist <strong>in</strong> the evaluation of the<br />

framework and the underly<strong>in</strong>g conceptual model.<br />

Conceptual Model Development<br />

This first stage was strongly founded <strong>in</strong> a constructivist epistemology (Savery and Duffy,<br />

2001), with the understand<strong>in</strong>g that the complexities underly<strong>in</strong>g effective assessment of<br />

<strong>in</strong>dividual student learn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> team-based subjects could only be <strong>in</strong>vestigated and<br />

understood through gather<strong>in</strong>g multiple perspectives from <strong>in</strong>dividual teach<strong>in</strong>g<br />

practitioners as well as from students, adm<strong>in</strong>istrators, and other stakeholders. To this end,<br />

we <strong>in</strong>terviewed academic staff and students at each of the five member <strong>in</strong>stitutions. These<br />

<strong>in</strong>terviews were transcribed and the research team conducted a prelim<strong>in</strong>ary thematic<br />

analysis (Boyatzis, 1998) regard<strong>in</strong>g the considerations, constra<strong>in</strong>ts, and opportunities that<br />

Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of <strong>Research</strong> <strong>in</strong> Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Education</strong> <strong>Symposium</strong> <strong>2011</strong><br />

Madrid, 4 th - 7 th October <strong>2011</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!