06.02.2013 Views

Research in Engineering Education Symposium 2011 - rees2009

Research in Engineering Education Symposium 2011 - rees2009

Research in Engineering Education Symposium 2011 - rees2009

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM) Pág<strong>in</strong>a 348 de 957<br />

Douglas, J.M. (1998). Conceptual Design of Chemical Processes. New York, NY: McGraw-<br />

Hill Book Company.<br />

Eberhardt, L.Y. (1987). Work<strong>in</strong>g with Women’s Groups, Vol. 1. Duluth, MN: Whole Person<br />

Association Inc.<br />

Hanna, M. and Wilson, G. (1991). Communicat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Bus<strong>in</strong>ess and Professional Sett<strong>in</strong>gs.<br />

New York, NY:McGraw-Hill,<br />

Jovanovic, J. & K<strong>in</strong>g, S. S. (1998). Boys and girls <strong>in</strong> the performance-based science<br />

classroom: Who’s do<strong>in</strong>g the perform<strong>in</strong>g? American <strong>Education</strong>al <strong>Research</strong> Journal,<br />

35(3), 477-496.<br />

Jones, J.E. and Barley, W.L. (1994). Group Development Assessment, HRDQ.<br />

Jones, J.E. (1999). Productive and Counter Productive Role Behaviors of Team Members.<br />

Valley Center, CA: Organizational Universe Systems.<br />

Kaplan, I. (1989). Measur<strong>in</strong>g work group effectiveness: A comparison of three <strong>in</strong>struments,<br />

Management Communication Quarterly, 2, 424-448.<br />

Knecht, R. (1998). An Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g Approach to the Assessment of the First-Year Design<br />

Sequence at the Colorado School of M<strong>in</strong>es. Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of the 1998 Conference for<br />

the American Society of Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Education</strong>. Seattle Wash<strong>in</strong>gton.<br />

Knecht, R. and Gale, J. (2005). Build<strong>in</strong>g an Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g Team: Peer Assessment Proves a<br />

Useful Instrument to Gauge Progress. Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of the 2005 American Society for<br />

Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Education</strong> Annual Conference & Exposition. Portland, Oregon.<br />

Lovelace, K., Shapiro, D.L., and We<strong>in</strong>gart, L.R. (2001). Maximiz<strong>in</strong>g Cross-Functional New<br />

Product Teams Innovativeness and Constra<strong>in</strong>t Adherence: A Conflict<br />

Communications Perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4) 779-793.<br />

MacPhail, L.H., Roloff, K.S., and Edmondson, A.C. (2009) Collaboration Across Knowledge<br />

Boundaries With<strong>in</strong> Diverse Teams: Reciprocal Expertise Affirmation as an Enabl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Condition, Build<strong>in</strong>g a Theoretical and <strong>Research</strong> Foundation. Laura Morgan Roberts<br />

and Jane E. Dutton (Ed.). Psychology Press.<br />

Pahl, G. and Beitz, W. (1996). Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g Design A Systematic Approach, Second Edition.<br />

London, England: Spr<strong>in</strong>ger.<br />

Pfeiffer, J.W. and Jones, J.E. (1979). Reference Guide to Handbooks and Annuals: Volumes I-<br />

VII and ’72-’79 Annuals, La Jolla, CA University Associates,<br />

Reh, F.J. (2010). Project Management 101. Assessed at About.com: Management. March<br />

<strong>2011</strong>.<br />

Rudd and Watson (1968). Strategy of Process Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g. John Wiley and Son Inc<br />

Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of <strong>Research</strong> <strong>in</strong> Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Education</strong> <strong>Symposium</strong> <strong>2011</strong><br />

Madrid, 4 th - 7 th October <strong>2011</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!