06.02.2013 Views

Research in Engineering Education Symposium 2011 - rees2009

Research in Engineering Education Symposium 2011 - rees2009

Research in Engineering Education Symposium 2011 - rees2009

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM) Pág<strong>in</strong>a 592 de 957<br />

Sign test<br />

As an example, let us comment how the sign test should be employed. The sign test is a<br />

nonparametric test that can be used to compare two paired samples. It is very flexible <strong>in</strong><br />

application and is especially simple to use and understand.<br />

The sign test is based on the differences of the simple paired values. The only <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

used by the sign test is the sign (positive or negative) of each difference. If the differences<br />

are preponderantly of one sign, this is taken as evidence for the alternative hypothesis.<br />

The follow<strong>in</strong>g example illustrates the use of this test <strong>in</strong> the Statistical Decision-Mak<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Laboratory.<br />

The test could, for <strong>in</strong>stance, be used to accept or reject the null hypothesis that the time<br />

employed <strong>in</strong> the old and new versions of the modules of the laboratory are the same<br />

versus the alternative hypothesis that the times are different, or to test the null hypothesis<br />

that the satisfaction with the old and new versions of the laboratory are the same versus<br />

the alternative hypothesis that they are different, or that the new version is more<br />

satisfactory for the student that the old one.<br />

For <strong>in</strong>stance, let us suppose that there are 11 laboratory groups and that they first follow<br />

the old version of the laboratory <strong>in</strong> one module and then they follow the new one <strong>in</strong> the<br />

same module. The next table shows the times employed by the groups, <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>utes.<br />

In this example the null hypothesis is:<br />

H0: The time employed by the groups <strong>in</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g the old and new version of the module is<br />

the same. And the alternative hypothesis is:<br />

H1: The time employed by the groups <strong>in</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g the old aversion is larger than the time<br />

for the new version.<br />

The first step is to determ<strong>in</strong>e the follow<strong>in</strong>g counts:<br />

N+ = Number of positive differences<br />

N- = Number of negative differences<br />

Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of <strong>Research</strong> <strong>in</strong> Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Education</strong> <strong>Symposium</strong> <strong>2011</strong><br />

Madrid, 4 th - 7 th October <strong>2011</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!