06.02.2013 Views

Research in Engineering Education Symposium 2011 - rees2009

Research in Engineering Education Symposium 2011 - rees2009

Research in Engineering Education Symposium 2011 - rees2009

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM) Pág<strong>in</strong>a 466 de 957<br />

An improvement of academic results by a self-study methodology <strong>in</strong> Transportation<br />

Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g subject<br />

Francisco Aparicio, Blanca Arenas, Felipe Jiménez, Enrique Alcalá<br />

francisco.aparicio@upm.es , barenas@etsii.upm.es , felipe.jimenez@upm.es ,<br />

enrique.alcala@upm.es<br />

Universidad Politécnica de Madrid<br />

Spa<strong>in</strong><br />

Abstract: This paper presents the results of a change <strong>in</strong> methodology when<br />

teach<strong>in</strong>g the subject "Transport Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g" <strong>in</strong> the BS <strong>in</strong> Industrial<br />

Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong> addition to the implementation of a cont<strong>in</strong>uous evaluation<br />

system. The change <strong>in</strong> methodology consists <strong>in</strong> the development of a study<br />

procedure for the students and the assessment of student capacity for analysis<br />

and synthesis. To implement these developments, a self-study guide has been<br />

prepared with a specification of objectives accord<strong>in</strong>g to the Bloom taxonomy,<br />

knowledge required and necessary resources; self-evaluation tests and problems<br />

specifically designed towards the learn<strong>in</strong>g objectives. Midterm tests have been<br />

carried out and their results have been compared with two control groups<br />

follow<strong>in</strong>g the traditional methodology teach<strong>in</strong>g. The statistical analysis of the<br />

data collected and the comparison between the different groups <strong>in</strong>dicates that<br />

the methodology and the on-l<strong>in</strong>e material have been useful to the students,<br />

achiev<strong>in</strong>g on average and improvement <strong>in</strong> academic performance.<br />

Introduction<br />

The academic performance is <strong>in</strong>timately related with the quality of the education and this<br />

depends, on a great basis, on the didactic and evaluation methodologies applied. Despite of<br />

this fact, the methodology of education has rema<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong>variable <strong>in</strong> many University<br />

<strong>in</strong>stitutions, on which it can be appreciated, on another hand, an extraord<strong>in</strong>ary evolution<br />

of other aspects of academic life (Aparicio and González, 1994). With the renovation of the<br />

tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g as raised <strong>in</strong> the frame of the process known as “Bolonia”, it is <strong>in</strong>tended, amongst<br />

other objectives, the evolution from a education that has as its axis the contents of the<br />

subjects, and the exposition of them by the teacher, towards a new strategy centered on<br />

the learn<strong>in</strong>g objectives, the active participation of the students <strong>in</strong> their achievement, and<br />

the <strong>in</strong>tellectual <strong>in</strong>teraction with the students by means of debates, non autonomous<br />

problem solv<strong>in</strong>g as well as other support and evaluation activities. In this context, it can be<br />

framed this teach<strong>in</strong>g experience which comb<strong>in</strong>es two strategies: an educational<br />

methodological change <strong>in</strong> teach<strong>in</strong>g to promote active learn<strong>in</strong>g by def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the learn<strong>in</strong>g<br />

objectives as <strong>in</strong>novation factor and the implementation of a cont<strong>in</strong>uous evaluation system<br />

of the subject “Transport Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g”, on the 9 th semester of the degree <strong>in</strong> Bachelor <strong>in</strong><br />

Industrial Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tensifications of Industrial Organization, Construction and<br />

Manufactur<strong>in</strong>g on the course 2010-<strong>2011</strong> (from this on will be referred as the<br />

“experimental group EG”) (Aparicio et al., 2010). The methodological change has consisted<br />

<strong>in</strong> the development of a methodology for students study and the evaluation of<br />

competences as analysis and synthesis capability, the ability to solve problems <strong>in</strong>dividual<br />

and collectively, accord<strong>in</strong>g to the objectives stated on the methodology. For the<br />

Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of <strong>Research</strong> <strong>in</strong> Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Education</strong> <strong>Symposium</strong> <strong>2011</strong><br />

Madrid, 4 th - 7 th October <strong>2011</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!