06.02.2013 Views

Research in Engineering Education Symposium 2011 - rees2009

Research in Engineering Education Symposium 2011 - rees2009

Research in Engineering Education Symposium 2011 - rees2009

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM) Pág<strong>in</strong>a 673 de 957<br />

various stakeholders reported <strong>in</strong> terms of assessment <strong>in</strong> this context. These results were<br />

then discussed <strong>in</strong> light of key literature sources and the professional observations of the<br />

research team members themselves , an ongo<strong>in</strong>g research team discussion that directly<br />

lead to the development of a conceptual model which captured one perspective on<br />

effective assessment of <strong>in</strong>dividual student learn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> teambased learn<strong>in</strong>g environments<br />

(see Figure 1 below).<br />

Figure 1. Conceptual model which underlies the current strategic assessment framework.<br />

The conceptual model is founded upon strong constructive alignment (Biggs and Tang,<br />

2007) of the subject’s learn<strong>in</strong>g outcomes, teach<strong>in</strong>g and learn<strong>in</strong>g activities, and assessment<br />

items. We suggest that ambiguous alignment between these elements <strong>in</strong> the design and<br />

implementation of a subject can create a context where both <strong>in</strong>structors and students may<br />

hold multiple and mismatched visions of the purpose, methods, and goals of assessment<br />

with<strong>in</strong> that subject.<br />

Learn<strong>in</strong>g outcomes are at the heart of the conceptual model and can serve as the<br />

<strong>in</strong>tellectual contract between students and <strong>in</strong>structors, delimit<strong>in</strong>g the knowledge and<br />

skills to be mastered. The model calls for ongo<strong>in</strong>g dialogue between <strong>in</strong>structor and<br />

students which utilizes the subject learn<strong>in</strong>g outcomes as a navigational tool. This dialogue<br />

helps students take ownership of their own learn<strong>in</strong>g processes through <strong>in</strong>structors<br />

support<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dividual students <strong>in</strong> creat<strong>in</strong>g their own evidence of master<strong>in</strong>g the learn<strong>in</strong>g<br />

outcomes as well as <strong>in</strong>structors supply<strong>in</strong>g feedback to both <strong>in</strong>dividuals and teams <strong>in</strong> terms<br />

of their relative engagement with and achievement of the learn<strong>in</strong>g outcomes. F<strong>in</strong>ally, a<br />

prioritization of the subject’s learn<strong>in</strong>g outcomes as well as pre-determ<strong>in</strong>ed performance<br />

levels for each learn<strong>in</strong>g outcome serve as the basis of assign<strong>in</strong>g the f<strong>in</strong>al grade.<br />

Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of <strong>Research</strong> <strong>in</strong> Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Education</strong> <strong>Symposium</strong> <strong>2011</strong><br />

Madrid, 4 th - 7 th October <strong>2011</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!