06.02.2013 Views

Research in Engineering Education Symposium 2011 - rees2009

Research in Engineering Education Symposium 2011 - rees2009

Research in Engineering Education Symposium 2011 - rees2009

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM) Pág<strong>in</strong>a 816 de 957<br />

framework. It ascribes five stages or cycles of value <strong>in</strong> the evolution of a learn<strong>in</strong>g<br />

community and we believe they are relevant to the evolution of EER <strong>in</strong>terventions.<br />

Wenger and his co-authors propose a progression through the follow<strong>in</strong>g learn<strong>in</strong>g cycles of<br />

value creation:<br />

1. Immediate value: activities and <strong>in</strong>teractions<br />

2. Potential value: knowledge capital<br />

3. Applied value: changes <strong>in</strong> practice<br />

4. 4 Realized value: performance improvement<br />

5. Refram<strong>in</strong>g value: redef<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g success<br />

Background<br />

In the work described here, we apply the framework to a recently completed three year<br />

nationallyfunded research project which set out to use a community of practice approach<br />

to <strong>in</strong>troduc<strong>in</strong>g active and cooperative lean<strong>in</strong>g techniques <strong>in</strong> lecture classes through the<br />

design of a learner activity monitor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>strument.<br />

Methodology<br />

We believe this is first time this particular framework has been applied as a lens <strong>in</strong> the<br />

field of EER and as this essentially exploratory research a qualitative methodology has<br />

been adopted.<br />

<strong>Research</strong> question<br />

Can this framework be recommended as an <strong>in</strong>strument to capture the value of an EER<br />

project?<br />

Procedure<br />

The <strong>in</strong>formation presented is based on data gathered from <strong>in</strong>terviews with the<br />

eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g lecturers who formed part of the core group of the Active Learn<strong>in</strong>g research<br />

project and validated by <strong>in</strong>vit<strong>in</strong>g the respondents to comment on the transcriptions of<br />

their <strong>in</strong>terviews at the end of the three-year period. This data is supplemented with other<br />

narrative and <strong>in</strong>stitutional data gathered dur<strong>in</strong>g the time the project was underway.<br />

The structure of the paper follows that proposed by Wenger et al for the five cycle<br />

assessment framework <strong>in</strong> that we exemplify each the cycles <strong>in</strong> the context of one of the<br />

schools participat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the project mentioned above.<br />

Cycle 1 Immediate value: activities and <strong>in</strong>teractions<br />

The most basic cycle of value creation considers network<strong>in</strong>g and community activities and<br />

<strong>in</strong>teractions <strong>in</strong> and of themselves.<br />

In this case, activities of the core community <strong>in</strong>cluded:<br />

Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of <strong>Research</strong> <strong>in</strong> Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Education</strong> <strong>Symposium</strong> <strong>2011</strong><br />

Madrid, 4 th - 7 th October <strong>2011</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!