06.02.2013 Views

Research in Engineering Education Symposium 2011 - rees2009

Research in Engineering Education Symposium 2011 - rees2009

Research in Engineering Education Symposium 2011 - rees2009

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM) Pág<strong>in</strong>a 710 de 957<br />

Topic: Tools 2 – Chair: James Pellegr<strong>in</strong>o<br />

Quality of experience of onl<strong>in</strong>e learn<strong>in</strong>g tools<br />

Alexander A. Kist, Hannah Jolly and Lyn Brodie<br />

kist@ieee.org , hannah.jolly@usq.edu.au , lyn.brodie@usq.edu.au<br />

University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba<br />

Australia<br />

Abstract: Onl<strong>in</strong>e learn<strong>in</strong>g tools have become important components of teach<strong>in</strong>g<br />

and course delivery. This paper discusses the issues surround<strong>in</strong>g research <strong>in</strong>to<br />

Quality of Experience (QoE) for onl<strong>in</strong>e learn<strong>in</strong>g tools and how it relates to<br />

technical performance, Quality of Service (QoS). The relationship between QoE<br />

and QoS for onl<strong>in</strong>e learn<strong>in</strong>g tools is often considered important for describ<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the optimal conditions for onl<strong>in</strong>e learn<strong>in</strong>g environments. Such research largely<br />

ignores the vital issue of how learners differ from consumers <strong>in</strong> their use of<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation and communication technologies such as <strong>in</strong>teractive multimedia<br />

environments. The implication of this difference for understand<strong>in</strong>g technology<br />

use for learn<strong>in</strong>g is presented and the need for an empirical study to address this<br />

is argued for. A pilot was undertaken to further def<strong>in</strong>e the methodological<br />

requirements of conduct<strong>in</strong>g a study <strong>in</strong>to the impact of system performance on<br />

QoE. The f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs of the pilot study describe issues and implications for<br />

design<strong>in</strong>g a research methodology which can beg<strong>in</strong> the process of mapp<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

QoE to QoS relationship for onl<strong>in</strong>e learn<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Introduction<br />

Onl<strong>in</strong>e learn<strong>in</strong>g activities are widely advocated as tools to enhance student engagement<br />

and assist their learn<strong>in</strong>g journey (e.g., Herr<strong>in</strong>gton, Oliver, & Reeves, 2003). In particular,<br />

modern distance education uses Information and Communication Technology (ICT) <strong>in</strong> an<br />

attempt to provide students with equitable learn<strong>in</strong>g experiences <strong>in</strong> onl<strong>in</strong>e environments,<br />

when proximal learn<strong>in</strong>g is not available. Learn<strong>in</strong>g aids span a variety of applications from<br />

lecture record<strong>in</strong>gs to remote access technologies. Remote Access Laboratories (RAL), for<br />

example, widely discussed <strong>in</strong> eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g discipl<strong>in</strong>es, allow students to use software and<br />

hardware remotely (e.g., Kist & Gibb<strong>in</strong>gs, 2010). As onl<strong>in</strong>e learn<strong>in</strong>g systems use<br />

telecommunication <strong>in</strong>frastructure and the Internet, system performance depends on<br />

access speed, geographical location as well as network conditions, e.g. traffic.<br />

There has been much work <strong>in</strong> telecommunications research on captur<strong>in</strong>g the performance<br />

of applications that rely on networks from a technical as well as from a consumer<br />

perspective. The former are identified by the term Quantity of Service (QoS), the latter by<br />

the term Quality of Experience (QoE). “QoS is def<strong>in</strong>ed as the ability of the network to<br />

provide a service at an assured service level” (Soldani, Li, & Cuny, 2006). Technical<br />

performance parameters that relate to QoS, such as delay, jitter and throughput, are<br />

relatively easy to measure; however, they say little about the experience of a user or if the<br />

system was fit for a purpose.<br />

Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of <strong>Research</strong> <strong>in</strong> Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Education</strong> <strong>Symposium</strong> <strong>2011</strong><br />

Madrid, 4 th - 7 th October <strong>2011</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!