06.02.2013 Views

Research in Engineering Education Symposium 2011 - rees2009

Research in Engineering Education Symposium 2011 - rees2009

Research in Engineering Education Symposium 2011 - rees2009

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM) Pág<strong>in</strong>a 757 de 957<br />

Figure 3. Methodology used to evaluate the improvement of both experimental group and control<br />

group<br />

Role play sceneries<br />

In this negotiation game each team is formed by three participants play<strong>in</strong>g different roles<br />

(Agent A, B and C), with a different degree of complexity. The game is played three<br />

different times chang<strong>in</strong>g the conditions and do<strong>in</strong>g the ZOPA smaller so the negotiation is<br />

go<strong>in</strong>g “harder”. Each scenario created had a smaller ZOPA so it was more difficult for the<br />

team to achieve an agreement. Table 1 shows the data <strong>in</strong>formation of the different<br />

scenarios for negotiation per day.<br />

Table 1. Role play negotiation scenery. Offer for a bridge construction that needs the participation of<br />

two subcontractors<br />

It can be observed <strong>in</strong> Figure 2 how the ZOPA has changed through the different scenarios.<br />

In the figures the variations per day <strong>in</strong> the production cost is shown. As it was planned<br />

Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of <strong>Research</strong> <strong>in</strong> Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Education</strong> <strong>Symposium</strong> <strong>2011</strong><br />

Madrid, 4 th - 7 th October <strong>2011</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!