Bulletin de liaison et d'information - Institut kurde de Paris
Bulletin de liaison et d'information - Institut kurde de Paris
Bulletin de liaison et d'information - Institut kurde de Paris
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
REVUE DE PRESSE-PRESS REVIEW-BERHEVOKA ÇAPÊ-RWISTA<br />
STAMPA-DENTRO DE LA PRENSA-BASIN ÖZETi<br />
armed attacks onlY serves to increase the strength of<br />
the radicals in the Kurdish movement. A vicious circle.<br />
It is now up to those within the DEP who in private<br />
argue against Dicle's policies and say they sincerely<br />
support Turkey's unity, to take action to<br />
break this ClfcJe.<br />
Either through an emergency convention which<br />
will topple Dicle and replace him with a: mo<strong>de</strong>rate<br />
lea<strong>de</strong>r, or by resigning from the party altog<strong>et</strong>her,<br />
such activists must immediatèly take action and differentiate<br />
themselves from the central ruling flank.<br />
What is equally important, for the sake of all the<br />
people of Turkey, is to be able to take a strong and<br />
<strong>de</strong>termined stance against terrorism, whatever its<br />
source.<br />
If those now gearing up to move against Dicle are<br />
sincere, they have to come out once and for all and<br />
con<strong>de</strong>m'rrterrorism. They must con<strong>de</strong>mn the use of<br />
terrorist tactics aimed at civilians for any cause and<br />
they must con<strong>de</strong>mn such tactics put into force by<br />
the PKK.<br />
'}lurkey today Is living through a serious era of<br />
provocation and it does not matter from which si<strong>de</strong><br />
It come~. Dicle, f~r hispa~, is~. dangerou~ as t~ose<br />
provokIng Kurdish e~mlly o~ the TurkIsh sI<strong>de</strong>.<br />
Everyone who genuInely wIshes to break the<br />
vicious circle and thus to avoid a civil war or another<br />
interrupti~n of, <strong>de</strong>mocracy, has to come to~<strong>et</strong>her<br />
and act agaInst provacateurs." For now, wnat is<br />
clear is that the first step has to come from the DEP<br />
si<strong>de</strong> and the main culpnt within it. This person, who<br />
b<strong>et</strong>r~ys not only humanity in general but the<br />
KurdIsh people he so much claims to be "tighting<br />
for," has to .be eith~r isolated with hi~ own groups<br />
- and left III the pIt he has so cJl!mslly fallen into<br />
- or removed from the party's lea<strong>de</strong>rship. Even<br />
then, il is going to be a difficult task for the 'mo<strong>de</strong>rates,"<br />
since they too are now among the unwanted<br />
in Turkey. But at least they will have the chance to<br />
maintain their own dignity and perhaps, in taking<br />
the necessary action, Will have lhe personal satisfaction<br />
of having given peace a chance.<br />
International Herald Tribune - February 17, 1994<br />
Saddam Is Responsible<br />
Iraq has been moving toward me<strong>et</strong>ing Unit-.<br />
ed Nations terms on disarmament, and in so<br />
doing it has improved its claim to have the<br />
United Nations lift the punishing economic<br />
sanctions. The United States and otherUN<br />
.members have respon<strong>de</strong>d by adding new conditions.<br />
Not only must Iraq me<strong>et</strong> intrusive<br />
disarmament requirements. It must also recognize<br />
the bor<strong>de</strong>r that the United Nations.<br />
drew b<strong>et</strong>ween it and Kuwait, end persecution<br />
of its Kurds and Shütes and prove its disarmament<br />
compliance over time.<br />
The adding of new conditions when a party<br />
g<strong>et</strong>s within range of me<strong>et</strong>ing old ones is<br />
knownas moving the goalposts. Usually it is<br />
unfair. lfit became a rule, it would give targ<strong>et</strong><br />
states a positive disincentive to respect UN<br />
strictures ...But Iraq is different.<br />
gamk - 21-22 février 1994<br />
It isdifféieilt because both the'foreign ~d<br />
the domestic policies practicedby.its lea<strong>de</strong>r,<br />
Saddam Hussein, have richly earned universal<br />
fear and loathi~g. Not' to say that no crasser<br />
motives are at play, such as keeping Iraq's oil<br />
off a <strong>de</strong>pressed international mark<strong>et</strong>. But a<br />
tegitimate and shared pru<strong>de</strong>nce compels oth.er<br />
.nations, of various political hues, to stay UDlt-.<br />
ed and. on guard against this <strong>de</strong>monstrably<br />
unprincipled violator of peace and human<br />
.rights. The break in normal UN ways is disàgreeable<br />
but seems a mo<strong>de</strong>st price to pay to<br />
contain his real and potential danger.<br />
The disappointing truth is that the embargo<br />
: and the other punitive elements that go with it<br />
have so far failed in their inner purpose of<br />
ending Saddam Hussein's rule -although the<br />
policy has restored much regional normality<br />
and.broughf a-tenuous relief to northern<br />
Kurds. But the inconclusiveness of the policy<br />
.is more an argument for keeping the pressure<br />
•on than for taking it off. If other nations must<br />
live with Saddam Hussein in<strong>de</strong>finitely, b<strong>et</strong>ter<br />
that he be contained.<br />
Many people remain troubled by the suffering<br />
of the innocent and unconsulted Iraqi<br />
'people. Their pain is real, and Saddam Hus-<br />
.sein has exploited it to muster support for<br />
. terminating sanctions. It needs to be un<strong>de</strong>rlined<br />
that UN policy permits entry of medi- .<br />
cines and foodstuffs. But the Iraqi lea<strong>de</strong>r, citing<br />
violations of "sovereignty," refuses to use the<br />
privilege. UN conditions center on monitoring<br />
Iraqi purchases and distribution and, unquestionably,<br />
do trample on Iraqi sovereignty.That<br />
is Iraq's bur<strong>de</strong>n for having started and lost the<br />
Gulf War. Saddam Hussein is responsible for<br />
<strong>de</strong>nying his people the humanitarian<br />
that others are eager to furnish them.<br />
- THE WASHINGTON POST.<br />
relief<br />
Un attentat à la bombe.<br />
contre un parti<br />
pro-kur<strong>de</strong> à Ankara<br />
Un attentat à la bombe contre le<br />
Parti <strong>de</strong> la Démocratie (DEP,<br />
pro-kur<strong>de</strong>), survenu vendredi<br />
soir à Ankara, a été revendiqué<br />
quelques heures plus tard par le "Djihad<br />
islamique. L'attentat a fait un mort <strong>et</strong> 16<br />
blessés, selon un bilan établi par les<br />
autorités.<br />
Il a été revendiqué dans la nuit<br />
<strong>de</strong> vendredi à samedi dans un appel téléphonique<br />
par un interlocuteur anonyme<br />
affirmant parlera~ nom <strong>de</strong>.l'orga(lisation<br />
fondamentaliste "Djihad Islamique",<br />
selon le préf<strong>et</strong> d'Ankara, Erdogan Sahinoglu.<br />
Ce <strong>de</strong>rnier a toutefois émis <strong>de</strong>s<br />
doutes quant à la véracité <strong>de</strong> c<strong>et</strong>te revendication,<br />
sans fournir d'autres précisions.<br />
Une bombe placée dans<br />
l'ascenseur <strong>de</strong> l'immeuble abritant le siè- .<br />
ge du parti pro-kur<strong>de</strong> avait explosé alors<br />
que l'ascenseur se trouvait au niveau du<br />
5e étage. Les locaux du DEP se trouvent<br />
aux 6e <strong>et</strong> 7e étages.<br />
Le "Djihad Islamique" avait<br />
revendiqué plusieurs attentats meurtriers<br />
à la bombe en Turquie, notamment<br />
contre un diplomate israélien en poste à<br />
Ankara, Ehud Sadan, en mars 1992, <strong>et</strong><br />
contre la synagogue Neve Shalom à<br />
Istanbul en septembre 1986, qui avait fait<br />
25 morts.<br />
192