01.03.2013 Views

2009 Performance Accountability Report Vol. 2 - Maryland Higher ...

2009 Performance Accountability Report Vol. 2 - Maryland Higher ...

2009 Performance Accountability Report Vol. 2 - Maryland Higher ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The State Plan recommends increased use of distance education, especially online learning.<br />

Through FY2007 Garrett’s enrollment in both credit and noncredit online courses experienced<br />

significant increases. Online credit enrollment grew by 163% and noncredit by 214% from<br />

FY04-FY07. However enrollment in both credit and noncredit on-line courses dropped off<br />

significantly in FY2008. During FY2008-<strong>2009</strong>, the College engaged in a re-evaluation of its<br />

distance learning program amid concerns about cost effectiveness and quality control,<br />

particularly with respect to on-line courses being imported from other institutions. As a result,<br />

fewer on-line courses were offered. Most of those issues have now been resolved and the<br />

FY2010-2013 Strategic Plan reaffirms the College’s commitment to increasing its distance<br />

learning capability and on-line course offerings.<br />

Due to the overall decline in State funding that has become the trend over much of the last<br />

decade, tuition revenue has assumed greater importance. This revenue stream can be increased<br />

either by raising the tuition rate or by increasing enrollment. Garrett has chosen to focus mainly<br />

on increasing enrollment. Garrett College had been slightly above the statewide median for incounty<br />

tuition, although its median household income remains among the lowest in the State.<br />

Consequently, Garrett College has only imposed modest tuition and fee increases to offset<br />

reductions in State funding. This strategy has worked. For FY2008, the community college<br />

systemwide average tuition and fees per credit hour was $107 while Garrett’s tuition and fees per<br />

credit hour was $99, making Garrett’s tuition and fees the sixth lowest in the State.<br />

Furthermore, Garrett’s tuition and fees as a percent of tuition and fees at <strong>Maryland</strong> public fouryear<br />

institutions has risen only slightly from 42.3% in FY2006 to 44.7% in FY<strong>2009</strong>, well below<br />

the FY2011 benchmark of 53.1%. Because the rate of tuition rise in the four-year institutions is<br />

outpacing Garrett’s rate of rise, the College is becoming a more affordable alternative for<br />

transfer students. To retain its competitiveness, the College will continue to work toward<br />

keeping tuition and fee increases to a minimum. In so doing, Garrett College is working to<br />

achieve the 2004 <strong>Maryland</strong> State Plan for Postsecondary Education goal to “achieve a system of<br />

postsecondary education that promotes accessibility and affordability for all <strong>Maryland</strong>ers.”<br />

Quality and Effectiveness: Student Satisfaction, Progress, and Achievement<br />

The seven indicators in this section provide evidence that Garrett is contributing toward “quality<br />

and effectiveness” as described in the 2004 <strong>Maryland</strong> State Plan for Postsecondary Education.<br />

Garrett’s vision is to be a vibrant learning center of first choice for local residents. The College<br />

believes it can best overcome barriers to obtaining a higher education by respecting and caring<br />

for students as individuals, by identifying their strengths and needs, by starting them at a point<br />

appropriate to their skill level, by providing them with appropriate support services, and by<br />

motivating and encouraging them to achieve standards of personal and academic excellence.<br />

Students give Garrett College very high marks on key factors pertaining to academic<br />

achievement. The survey of 2005 alumni showed that 96% were satisfied with their educational<br />

goal achievement. A survey was conducted of students who previously enrolled in spring 2007<br />

but failed to re-enroll in the following semester (fall 2007). This survey showed that nonreturning<br />

student satisfaction with educational goal achievement was 91.3%, just slightly below<br />

the percentage obtained from the fall 2005 survey (92.6%).<br />

127

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!