2009 Performance Accountability Report Vol. 2 - Maryland Higher ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

teacher training Number of graduates teaching in Outcome Maryland schools 4,10 Pass rates for undergraduates and Quality MAT post-Bachelor’s on PRAXIS II 5 102 114 88 62 Goal 3: Provide access to higher education for residents of Maryland and the region. 99% 99% 97% 94% Objective 3.1: Increase the percentage of graduates employed one year out from 97% in survey year 2002 to 98% in survey year 2008. 2006 2007 2008 2009 Performance Measure Actual Actual Actual Actual Input Headcount enrollment (Fall Total in FY) 5,041 4,910 4,993 5,215 Number of graduates with a Output Bachelor’s degree 849 796 790 752 2000 Survey 2002 Survey 2005 Survey 2008 Survey Performance Measure Actual Actual Actual Actual Outcome Number of graduates working in 3 Maryland 584 552 600 606 Outcome Percent of graduates employed one year out 3 98% 97% 91% 94% Objective 3.2: By 2009, maintain the number of students enrolled in courses delivered off campus at a level equal to or greater than the 2004 level of 2,902. 2006 2007 2008 2009 Performance Measure Actual Actual Actual Actual Input Number of annual off campus course enrollments 6 2,617 2,748 3,141 3,487 Objective 3.3: Increase the second-year retention rate of FSU undergraduates from 75.5% in 2004 to 80.0% in 2009. Performance Measure 2006 Actual 2007 Actual 2008 Actual 2009 Actual Output Retention Rate all students 75.3% 75.5% 72.4% 78.0% Objective 3.4: Attain a six-year graduation rate of FSU undergraduates from 58.6% in 2004 to 61.7% in 2009. 2006 2007 2008 2009 Performance Measure Actual Actual Actual Actual Output Graduation Rate all students 56.0% 55.1% 59.1% 57.3% Objective 3.5: Maintain the approximate percent of economically disadvantaged students from 48.8% in 2004 to 50.0% in 2009. Performance Measure 2006 Actual 2007 Actual 2008 Actual 2009 Actual Input Percent of economically disadvantaged students 46.4% 48.2% 47.8% 50.0% Goal 4: Continue efforts to create an environment that prepares students to live and work in a diverse society. 282
Objective 4.1: Attain greater faculty diversity: women from 37.6% in 2004 to 38.9% in 2009; African- Americans from 3.8% in 2004 to 4.5% in 2009. 2006 2007 2008 2009 Performance Measure Actual Actual Actual Actual Output Faculty Diversity FT: Women 37.8% 38.3% 37.3% 38.8% African American 3.9% 4.2% 4.3% 3.7% Objective 4.2: By 2009, maintain the percentage of African-American undergraduates at a level equal to or greater than the 2004 level of 12.3%. 2006 2007 2008 2009 Performance Measure Actual Actual Actual Actual Input: Percent African American (Fall Undergraduate in FY) 14.8% 16.6% 19.6% 21.9% Objective 4.3: By 2009, sustain the percentage of minority undergraduates at a level equal to or greater than the 2004 level of 16.2%. 2006 2007 2008 2009 Performance Measure Actual Actual Actual Actual Input: Percent Minority (Fall Undergraduate in FY) 18.9% 20.6% 23.7% 26.1% Objective 4.4: Achieve and sustain the second-year retention rate of African-American students at 83.0% through 2009. Performance Measure 2006 2007 2008 2009 Actual Actual Actual Actual Output: Retention Rate African American 77.4% 80.6% 77.7% 81.7% Objective 4.5: Increase the second-year retention rate of minority students from 72.9% in 2004 to 83.0% in 2009. Performance Measure 2006 2007 2008 2009 Actual Actual Actual Actual Output: Retention Rate Minority 76.8% 78.1% 75.0% 79.0% Objective 4.6: Attain and preserve a six-year graduation rate of African-American students at 45.3% through 2009. 2006 2007 2008 2009 Performance Measure Actual Actual Actual Actual Output: Graduation Rate African American 54.8% 53.9% 49.1% 51.5% Objective 4.7: Realize and maintain a six-year graduation rate of minority students at 47.1% through 2009. 2006 2007 2008 2009 Performance Measure Actual Actual Actual Actual Output: Graduation Rate Minority 50.0% 52.0% 54.3% 51.7% 283
Page 1 and 2:
2009 Performance Accountability Rep
Page 3 and 4:
COMMUNITY COLLEGES 1
Page 5 and 6:
Corporate Headquarters building adj
Page 7 and 8:
to improve this measure. Enrollment
Page 9 and 10:
government or industry-required cer
Page 11 and 12:
JumpStart - Creating a Pathway to S
Page 13 and 14:
Articulation Agreement with Potomac
Page 15 and 16:
preparing direct mail pieces for bu
Page 17 and 18:
ALLEGANY COLLEGE OF MARYLAND 2009 A
Page 19 and 20:
ALLEGANY COLLEGE OF MARYLAND 2009 A
Page 21 and 22:
ANNE ARUNDEL COMMUNITY COLLEGE MISS
Page 23 and 24:
eceiving a GPA of zero declined for
Page 25 and 26:
The number of minority students att
Page 27 and 28:
graduates are prepared to enter the
Page 29 and 30:
Student examinees registered to dat
Page 31 and 32:
published in the local and Baltimor
Page 33 and 34:
ANNE ARUNDEL COMMUNITY COLLEGE 2009
Page 35 and 36:
ANNE ARUNDEL COMMUNITY COLLEGE 2009
Page 37 and 38:
BALTIMORE CITY COMMUNITY COLLEGE MI
Page 39 and 40:
usiness community it says BCCC is w
Page 41 and 42:
income, first-generation college st
Page 43 and 44:
the job market; contributes to acce
Page 45 and 46:
them. Our establishment of the Mary
Page 47 and 48:
literacy training with 130 free or
Page 49 and 50:
COST CONTAINMENT Significant cost c
Page 51 and 52:
BALTIMORE CITY COMMUNITY COLLEGE 20
Page 53 and 54:
BALTIMORE CITY COMMUNITY COLLEGE 20
Page 55 and 56:
Since inception, Carroll Community
Page 57 and 58:
Providing Affordable Higher Educati
Page 59 and 60:
variety of computer training course
Page 61 and 62:
to engage students, make science ac
Page 63 and 64:
CARROLL COMMUNITY COLLEGE 2009 ACCO
Page 65 and 66:
CARROLL COMMUNITY COLLEGE 2009 ACCO
Page 67 and 68:
Cecil College 2009 Institutional Pe
Page 69 and 70:
now able to access information and
Page 71 and 72:
earned college credit and/or indust
Page 73 and 74:
skills and literacy (indicator #30)
Page 75 and 76:
Cost Containment FY 2009 Significan
Page 77 and 78:
14 16 CECIL COLLEGE 2009 ACCOUNTABI
Page 79 and 80:
CECIL COLLEGE 2009 ACCOUNTABILITY R
Page 81 and 82:
egistrations. The college was one o
Page 83 and 84:
programs; thirty percent are in tra
Page 85 and 86:
Diversity Chesapeake College embrac
Page 87 and 88:
Due to repackaging of courses in no
Page 89 and 90:
Community Partnerships The college
Page 91 and 92:
COST CONTAINMENT Chesapeake College
Page 93 and 94:
14 CHESAPEAKE COLLEGE 2009 ACCOUNTA
Page 95 and 96:
CHESAPEAKE COLLEGE 2009 ACCOUNTABIL
Page 97 and 98:
As of 2008 CCBC is close to meeting
Page 99 and 100:
Student Satisfaction, Progress and
Page 101 and 102:
Diversity CCBC is proud of its abil
Page 103 and 104:
CCBC expects that the number of cou
Page 105 and 106:
CCBC continued to expand its credit
Page 107 and 108:
A reduction in Utility Consumption
Page 109 and 110:
THE COMMUNITY COLLEGE OF BALTIMORE
Page 111 and 112:
THE COMMUNITY COLLEGE OF BALTIMORE
Page 113 and 114:
Affordability indicators except the
Page 115 and 116:
additional opportunities between th
Page 117 and 118:
needs in Frederick County and the s
Page 119 and 120:
The College’s staff take communit
Page 121 and 122:
3. ACCOUNTABILITY INDICATORS Includ
Page 123 and 124:
FREDERICK COMMUNITY COLLEGE 2009 AC
Page 125 and 126:
FREDERICK COMMUNITY COLLEGE 2009 AC
Page 127 and 128:
and fees, financial aid and scholar
Page 129 and 130:
The State Plan recommends increased
Page 131 and 132:
Diversity Goal 3 of the 2004 Maryla
Page 133 and 134:
enchmark.) Annual course enrollment
Page 135 and 136:
lived with families in the communit
Page 137 and 138:
Student Characteristics (not Benchm
Page 139 and 140:
GARRETT COLLEGE 2009 ACCOUNTABILITY
Page 141 and 142:
HAGERSTOWN COMMUNITY COLLEGE MISSIO
Page 143 and 144:
community college students and thei
Page 145 and 146:
Explanation Required Response to Co
Page 147 and 148:
ACCOUNTABILITY INDICATORS The accou
Page 149 and 150:
HAGERSTOWN COMMUNITY COLLEGE 2009 A
Page 151 and 152:
HAGERSTOWN COMMUNITY COLLEGE 2009 A
Page 153 and 154:
eturn affects the quality of the da
Page 155 and 156:
To help alleviate the nursing short
Page 157 and 158:
Institute and was one of three comm
Page 159 and 160:
HARFORD COMMUNITY COLLEGE 2009 ACCO
Page 161 and 162:
Community Outreach and Impact HARFO
Page 163 and 164:
problem at HCC. The college offers
Page 165 and 166:
usiness training. The college’s b
Page 167 and 168:
out-of-state institutions and conti
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
HCC will use funds awarded by the N
Page 173 and 174:
Section 5: Funding Issues Significa
Page 175 and 176:
HOWARD COMMUNITY COLLEGE 2009 ACCOU
Page 177 and 178:
HOWARD COMMUNITY COLLEGE 2009 ACCOU
Page 179 and 180:
Degree Progress Model Students enro
Page 181 and 182:
Academic Performance and Goal Achie
Page 183 and 184:
Credit Enrollment Montgomery Colleg
Page 185 and 186:
increased to 28.6 percent in fall 2
Page 187 and 188:
Public Schools, Montgomery College,
Page 189 and 190:
Significant Cost Containment Action
Page 191 and 192:
MONTGOMERY COLLEGE 2009 ACCOUNTABIL
Page 193 and 194:
MONTGOMERY COLLEGE 2009 ACCOUNTABIL
Page 195 and 196:
communicating the state of the coll
Page 197 and 198:
last year. Specific operational imp
Page 199 and 200:
driver education programs and to th
Page 201 and 202:
cohorts when measured by percentage
Page 203 and 204:
2008 headcount. The improving enrol
Page 205 and 206:
seeking credit students were enroll
Page 207 and 208:
Community Outreach and Impact Princ
Page 209 and 210:
software; Workforce Development and
Page 211 and 212:
14 16 PRINCE GEORGE'S COMMUNITY COL
Page 213 and 214:
PRINCE GEORGE'S COMMUNITY COLLEGE 2
Page 215 and 216:
Occupational Program Associate Degr
Page 217 and 218:
every effort to provide access by k
Page 219 and 220:
As an indication of CSM’s commitm
Page 221 and 222:
The CSM Energetics cohort that was
Page 223 and 224:
Student Characteristics (not Benchm
Page 225 and 226:
COLLEGE OF SOUTHERN MARYLAND 2009 A
Page 227 and 228:
WOR-WIC COMMUNITY COLLEGE MISSION W
Page 229 and 230:
The successful-persister rate for t
Page 231 and 232:
Supporting the State Plan action re
Page 233 and 234: 180. An increase to 129 occurred in
Page 235 and 236: The college has partnered with the
Page 237 and 238: 13. Used a National Joint Powers Al
Page 239 and 240: 14 WOR-WIC COMMUNITY COLLEGE 2009 A
Page 241 and 242: WOR-WIC COMMUNITY COLLEGE 2009 ACCO
Page 243 and 244: BOWIE STATE UNIVERSITY MISSION Bowi
Page 245 and 246: KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMA
Page 247 and 248: GOAL 4: ENHANCE INCOME FROM EXTERNA
Page 249 and 250: information is underreported since
Page 251 and 252: FY 2009 COST CONTAINMENT EFFORTS Fo
Page 253 and 254: actuals per MSDE) 5 Input Number of
Page 255 and 256: COPPIN STATE UNIVERSITY MISSION A c
Page 257 and 258: Progress Made A critical mission of
Page 259 and 260: Progress Made Coppin’s second-yea
Page 261 and 262: Performance measures for this goal
Page 263 and 264: percent less expensive than the sta
Page 265 and 266: In FY 2008, Coppin’s second-year
Page 267 and 268: KEY GOALS AND OBJECTIVES Goal 1: Pr
Page 269 and 270: ($000’s) 6,7 Outcome Ratio of med
Page 271 and 272: Performance Measures Input Total nu
Page 273 and 274: FROSTBURG STATE UNIVERSITY INSTITUT
Page 275 and 276: Computer Information Systems, have
Page 277 and 278: course sections were offered in the
Page 279 and 280: Goal 5: Increase recognition for th
Page 281 and 282: Approximately 70% of FSU’s teache
Page 283: KEY GOALS AND OBJECTIVES Goal 1: Se
Page 287 and 288: Note: 1 Cumulative number of initia
Page 289 and 290: Kiplinger’s Personal Finance maga
Page 291 and 292: Organizations to support a diverse
Page 293 and 294: By providing additional academic as
Page 295 and 296: approximately 7,275 applications we
Page 297 and 298: In the past ten years, the nursing
Page 299 and 300: Salisbury University continues its
Page 301 and 302: Goal 2. Utilize strategic collabora
Page 303 and 304: through 2009. 2006 2007 2008 2009 P
Page 305 and 306: TOWSON UNIVERSITY MISSION Towson Un
Page 307 and 308: eligible students. The University c
Page 309 and 310: With the Community College of Balti
Page 311 and 312: eleases, saving $11,000, were imple
Page 313 and 314: It should also be noted that the nu
Page 315 and 316: KEY GOALS AND OBJECTIVES Goal 1: Cr
Page 317 and 318: Goal 2: Promote economic developmen
Page 319 and 320: Objective 4.4 Maintain the level of
Page 321 and 322: Baltimore does not offer any progra
Page 323 and 324: FY 2009 Funding Issues and Cost Con
Page 325 and 326: Objective 2.4 By FY 2009, expand th
Page 327 and 328: UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND EASTERN SHOR
Page 329 and 330: 2008-2009 academic year, these incl
Page 331 and 332: enroll at UMES, they matriculate in
Page 333 and 334: UMES continues to review its GPA re
Page 335 and 336:
Enrollment in Distance Education an
Page 337 and 338:
Summary The University of Maryland
Page 339 and 340:
Objective 3.1 Increase the total nu
Page 341 and 342:
UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND, UNIVERSITY
Page 343 and 344:
MHEC Goal 2: Achieve a system of po
Page 345 and 346:
MHEC Goal 5: Promote economic growt
Page 347 and 348:
MHEC included this comment in last
Page 349 and 350:
Actual Actual Actual Actual Quality
Page 351 and 352:
ST. MARY’S COLLEGE OF MARYLAND MI
Page 353 and 354:
of graduating seniors rating health
Page 355 and 356:
KEY GOALS AND OBJECTIVES Note: Unle
Page 357 and 358:
Objective 2.3 Between 2005 and 2009
Page 359 and 360:
Output Four-year graduation rate at
Page 361 and 362:
Goal 7: Increase access for student
Page 363 and 364:
Outcome Recycling rate for solid wa
Page 365 and 366:
UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND, BALTIMORE M
Page 367 and 368:
through surveys sent to deans, admi
Page 369 and 370:
implemented a 21 st century oral he
Page 371 and 372:
RESPONSE TO ISSUES/QUESTIONS RAISED
Page 373 and 374:
KEY GOALS AND OBJECTIVES Goal 1: Ev
Page 375 and 376:
Objective 3.3 By fiscal year 2010 m
Page 377 and 378:
UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND, BALTIMORE C
Page 379 and 380:
Engineering Society (AES) Conferenc
Page 381 and 382:
vs. 66.3% (see Objectives 4.3 and 5
Page 383 and 384:
1970s are now reaching retirement a
Page 385 and 386:
Total Efficiency Efforts $3,060 UMB
Page 387 and 388:
Objective 2.2 Increase the estimate
Page 389 and 390:
Objective 5.3 Increase the number o
Page 391 and 392:
UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND 2009 Institu
Page 393 and 394:
Maryland Transfer Advantage Program
Page 395 and 396:
The University’s Strategic Plan a
Page 397 and 398:
Local Economic Development. The Uni
Page 399 and 400:
Page 401 and 402:
decline in teacher enrollment at th
Page 403 and 404:
Objective 2.2 Increase the average
Page 405 and 406:
Objective 2.13 Increase the six-yea
Page 407 and 408:
Objective 5.5 Maintain the percenta
Page 409 and 410:
choice for the children, grandchild
Page 411 and 412:
places emphasis on attracting and r
Page 413 and 414:
financial aid packages that would m
Page 415 and 416:
ACCOUNTABILITY GOALS, OBJECTIVES AN
Page 417 and 418:
Percent of degrees awarded to Afric
Page 419 and 420:
Objective 6.3 Maintain the percenta
Page 421 and 422:
MISSION/ MANDATE PERFORMANCE INDICA
Page 423 and 424:
QUALITY AND EFFECTIVENESS: STUDENT
Page 425 and 426:
17. Successful-persister rate after
Page 427 and 428:
28. Employer satisfaction with cont
Page 429 and 430:
FY 08: Fall 01 cohort FY 09: Fall 0
Page 431 and 432:
FY 10: Fall 09 (est) FY 11: Fall 10
Page 433 and 434:
Coppin State University MFR 2009 OP
Page 435 and 436:
Page 437 and 438:
Page 439 and 440:
Page 441 and 442:
Page 443 and 444:
Page 445 and 446:
RB26.00 FROSTBURG STATE UNIVERSITY
Page 447 and 448:
Page 449 and 450:
Page 451 and 452:
Page 453 and 454:
Page 455 and 456:
Page 457 and 458:
Page 459 and 460:
Template Objective Salisbury Univer
Page 461 and 462:
Page 463 and 464:
Page 465 and 466:
Page 467 and 468:
Template Objective SU USM Indicator
Page 469 and 470:
TOWSON UNIVERSITY - MFR 2008 OPERAT
Page 471 and 472:
Page 473 and 474:
Page 475 and 476:
Page 477 and 478:
Page 479 and 480:
Page 481 and 482:
Page 483 and 484:
29 2005 Actual: graduates who took
Page 485 and 486:
Est: Class of 2010 grads 33 Fiscal
Page 487 and 488:
2005 Survey after graduation by tot
Page 489 and 490:
2.4 Number of students enrolled in
Page 491 and 492:
OUTPUTS 6 FY 09: Cohort of 2007 4.1
Page 493 and 494:
9 FY 09: Cohort of 2002 4.4 Six-yea
Page 495 and 496:
12 FY 09: Fall 08 Actual 2.1 Percen
Page 497 and 498:
16 5.2 Funds received through fundr
Page 499 and 500:
19 FY 08: Fall 06 + Spring 06 (ETS
Page 501 and 502:
EFFICIENCY 22 FY 09: Fiscal Year 08
Page 503 and 504:
June 27, 2008 - UMUC - Common + Ins
Page 505 and 506:
Page 507 and 508:
Page 509 and 510:
OPERATIONAL DEFINITIONS FOR MFR/ACC
Page 511 and 512:
Page 513 and 514:
Page 515 and 516:
Measure # Special Timeframe Issues
Page 517 and 518:
Measure # Special Timeframe Issues
Page 519 and 520:
Page 521 and 522:
9 FY 05: cohort of 2003 4.2 African
Page 523 and 524:
19 FY 05: 2000 survey- 1999 bach de
Page 525 and 526:
4/12/2010 UMBC MFR Operational Defi
Page 527 and 528:
UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PAR
Page 529 and 530:
Page 531 and 532:
Page 533 and 534:
Page 535 and 536:
MORGAN STATE UNIVERSITY OPERATIONAL
Page 537 and 538:
INDICATOR SOURCE OPERATIONAL DEFINI
Page 539 and 540:
SUGGESTED GUIDELINES - BENCHMARKING
Page 541 and 542:
INSTITUTIONAL PERFORMANCE ACCOUNTAB
Page 543 and 544:
5. Cost Containment Significant cos
Page 545:
4. Cost containment Significant cos
show all

2009 Performance Accountability Report Vol. 2 - Maryland Higher ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?