2009 Performance Accountability Report Vol. 2 - Maryland Higher ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Coppin State University MFR 2009 OPERATIONAL DEFINITIONS Measure # Special Timeframe Issues FY 09: Fall 08 FY 10: Fall 09 (est.) FY 11: Fall 10 (est.) 20. FY 06: Fall 05 FY 07: Fall 06 FY 08: Fall 07 FY 09: Fall 08 FY 10: Fall 09 (est.) FY 11: Fall 10 (est.) 21. FY 06:cohort of 1999 FY 07:cohort of 2000 FY 08:cohort of 2001 FY 09:cohort of 2002 FY 10:cohort of 2003 (est.) FY 11:cohort of 2004 (est.) 22. FY 06:cohort of 1999 FY 07:cohort of 2000 FY 08:cohort of 2001 FY 09:cohort of 2002 FY 10:cohort of 2003 (est.) FY 11:cohort of 2004 (est.) 23. FY 06:cohort of 1999 FY 07:cohort of 2000 FY 08:cohort of 2001 FY 09:cohort of 2002 FY 10:cohort of 2003 (est.) FY 11:cohort of 2004 (est.) COPPIN STATE UNIVERSITY OPERATIONAL DEFINITIONS FOR MFR/ACCOUNTABILITY MEASURES/INDICATORS USM Template Objective Indicator/Measure Source Operational Definition Control Procedures 2.3 Number of graduate degrees awarded in Nursing DIS data file 3.1 Six year graduation rate of all students MHEC : EIS, DIS 3.1 Six year graduation rate of all minority students 3.2 Six year graduation rate of African- American students 436 MHEC : EIS, DIS MHEC : EIS, DIS Self-explanatory See the control procedures for measure #15 above. The percentage of first-time, full-time degree-seeking undergraduates who graduated from any Maryland public four-year institution within six years of matriculation. The percentage of first-time, full-time degree-seeking undergraduates who graduated from any Maryland public four-year institution within six years of matriculation. The percentage of first-time, full-time degree-seeking African-American undergraduates who graduated from any Maryland public four-year institution within six years of Data are taken from MHEC Retention and Graduation report. However the general control procedures for measures #1 and #15 above are applicable. See the control procedures for measure #18 above. See the control procedures for measure #18 above.
Coppin State University MFR 2009 OPERATIONAL DEFINITIONS COPPIN STATE UNIVERSITY OPERATIONAL DEFINITIONS FOR MFR/ACCOUNTABILITY MEASURES/INDICATORS Measure # Special Timeframe Issues USM Template Objective Indicator/Measure Source Operational Definition matriculation. Control Procedures 24. FY 06:cohort of 1999 3.3 Second year retention rate of all students MHEC : The percentage of first-time, See the control procedures for measure FY 07:cohort of 2000 EIS, DIS full-time degree-seeking #18 above. FY 08:cohort of 2001 undergraduates who re- FY 09:cohort of 2002 enrolled at CSU one year FY 10:cohort of 2003 (est.) FY 11:cohort of 2004 (est.) after matriculation. 25. FY 06:cohort of 1999 3.3 Second year retention rate of all MHEC : The percentage of first-time, See the control procedures for measure FY 07:cohort of 2000 minority students EIS, DIS full-time degree-seeking #18 above. FY 08:cohort of 2001 minority undergraduates who . FY 09:cohort of 2002 re-enrolled at CSU one year FY 10:cohort of 2003 (est.) FY 11:cohort of 2004 (est.) after matriculation. 26. FY 06:cohort of 1999 3.4 Second year retention rate of African- MHEC : The percentage of first-time, See the control procedures for measure FY 07:cohort of 2000 American students EIS, DIS full-time degree-seeking #18 above. FY 08:cohort of 2001 African-American FY 09:cohort of 2002 undergraduates who re- FY 10:cohort of 2003 (est.) enrolled at CSU one year FY 11:cohort of 2004 (est.) after matriculation. OUTCOMES 27. FY 06: AY 05-06 2.1 Number of teacher education graduates MSDE Pertains only to “new hires Data provided by the USM Office. FY 07: AY 06-07 employed in Maryland who graduated from a USM FY 08: AY 07-08 institution and were hired by FY 09: AY 08-09 LEAs.” FY 10: AY 09-10 (est.) FY 11: AY 10-11 (est.) 28. 2000 survey: 1999 bach degree recipients 2.2 Percent of baccalaureate IT graduates employed in Maryland 437 MHEC follow-up (The percentage of bachelor’s degree recipients from IT Data are taken from triennial alumni follow up survey, sponsored by MHEC.
Page 1 and 2:
2009 Performance Accountability Rep
Page 3 and 4:
COMMUNITY COLLEGES 1
Page 5 and 6:
Corporate Headquarters building adj
Page 7 and 8:
to improve this measure. Enrollment
Page 9 and 10:
government or industry-required cer
Page 11 and 12:
JumpStart - Creating a Pathway to S
Page 13 and 14:
Articulation Agreement with Potomac
Page 15 and 16:
preparing direct mail pieces for bu
Page 17 and 18:
ALLEGANY COLLEGE OF MARYLAND 2009 A
Page 19 and 20:
ALLEGANY COLLEGE OF MARYLAND 2009 A
Page 21 and 22:
ANNE ARUNDEL COMMUNITY COLLEGE MISS
Page 23 and 24:
eceiving a GPA of zero declined for
Page 25 and 26:
The number of minority students att
Page 27 and 28:
graduates are prepared to enter the
Page 29 and 30:
Student examinees registered to dat
Page 31 and 32:
published in the local and Baltimor
Page 33 and 34:
ANNE ARUNDEL COMMUNITY COLLEGE 2009
Page 35 and 36:
ANNE ARUNDEL COMMUNITY COLLEGE 2009
Page 37 and 38:
BALTIMORE CITY COMMUNITY COLLEGE MI
Page 39 and 40:
usiness community it says BCCC is w
Page 41 and 42:
income, first-generation college st
Page 43 and 44:
the job market; contributes to acce
Page 45 and 46:
them. Our establishment of the Mary
Page 47 and 48:
literacy training with 130 free or
Page 49 and 50:
COST CONTAINMENT Significant cost c
Page 51 and 52:
BALTIMORE CITY COMMUNITY COLLEGE 20
Page 53 and 54:
BALTIMORE CITY COMMUNITY COLLEGE 20
Page 55 and 56:
Since inception, Carroll Community
Page 57 and 58:
Providing Affordable Higher Educati
Page 59 and 60:
variety of computer training course
Page 61 and 62:
to engage students, make science ac
Page 63 and 64:
CARROLL COMMUNITY COLLEGE 2009 ACCO
Page 65 and 66:
CARROLL COMMUNITY COLLEGE 2009 ACCO
Page 67 and 68:
Cecil College 2009 Institutional Pe
Page 69 and 70:
now able to access information and
Page 71 and 72:
earned college credit and/or indust
Page 73 and 74:
skills and literacy (indicator #30)
Page 75 and 76:
Cost Containment FY 2009 Significan
Page 77 and 78:
14 16 CECIL COLLEGE 2009 ACCOUNTABI
Page 79 and 80:
CECIL COLLEGE 2009 ACCOUNTABILITY R
Page 81 and 82:
egistrations. The college was one o
Page 83 and 84:
programs; thirty percent are in tra
Page 85 and 86:
Diversity Chesapeake College embrac
Page 87 and 88:
Due to repackaging of courses in no
Page 89 and 90:
Community Partnerships The college
Page 91 and 92:
COST CONTAINMENT Chesapeake College
Page 93 and 94:
14 CHESAPEAKE COLLEGE 2009 ACCOUNTA
Page 95 and 96:
CHESAPEAKE COLLEGE 2009 ACCOUNTABIL
Page 97 and 98:
As of 2008 CCBC is close to meeting
Page 99 and 100:
Student Satisfaction, Progress and
Page 101 and 102:
Diversity CCBC is proud of its abil
Page 103 and 104:
CCBC expects that the number of cou
Page 105 and 106:
CCBC continued to expand its credit
Page 107 and 108:
A reduction in Utility Consumption
Page 109 and 110:
THE COMMUNITY COLLEGE OF BALTIMORE
Page 111 and 112:
THE COMMUNITY COLLEGE OF BALTIMORE
Page 113 and 114:
Affordability indicators except the
Page 115 and 116:
additional opportunities between th
Page 117 and 118:
needs in Frederick County and the s
Page 119 and 120:
The College’s staff take communit
Page 121 and 122:
3. ACCOUNTABILITY INDICATORS Includ
Page 123 and 124:
FREDERICK COMMUNITY COLLEGE 2009 AC
Page 125 and 126:
FREDERICK COMMUNITY COLLEGE 2009 AC
Page 127 and 128:
and fees, financial aid and scholar
Page 129 and 130:
The State Plan recommends increased
Page 131 and 132:
Diversity Goal 3 of the 2004 Maryla
Page 133 and 134:
enchmark.) Annual course enrollment
Page 135 and 136:
lived with families in the communit
Page 137 and 138:
Student Characteristics (not Benchm
Page 139 and 140:
GARRETT COLLEGE 2009 ACCOUNTABILITY
Page 141 and 142:
HAGERSTOWN COMMUNITY COLLEGE MISSIO
Page 143 and 144:
community college students and thei
Page 145 and 146:
Explanation Required Response to Co
Page 147 and 148:
ACCOUNTABILITY INDICATORS The accou
Page 149 and 150:
HAGERSTOWN COMMUNITY COLLEGE 2009 A
Page 151 and 152:
HAGERSTOWN COMMUNITY COLLEGE 2009 A
Page 153 and 154:
eturn affects the quality of the da
Page 155 and 156:
To help alleviate the nursing short
Page 157 and 158:
Institute and was one of three comm
Page 159 and 160:
HARFORD COMMUNITY COLLEGE 2009 ACCO
Page 161 and 162:
Community Outreach and Impact HARFO
Page 163 and 164:
problem at HCC. The college offers
Page 165 and 166:
usiness training. The college’s b
Page 167 and 168:
out-of-state institutions and conti
Page 169 and 170:
Explanation Required Response to Co
Page 171 and 172:
HCC will use funds awarded by the N
Page 173 and 174:
Section 5: Funding Issues Significa
Page 175 and 176:
HOWARD COMMUNITY COLLEGE 2009 ACCOU
Page 177 and 178:
HOWARD COMMUNITY COLLEGE 2009 ACCOU
Page 179 and 180:
Degree Progress Model Students enro
Page 181 and 182:
Academic Performance and Goal Achie
Page 183 and 184:
Credit Enrollment Montgomery Colleg
Page 185 and 186:
increased to 28.6 percent in fall 2
Page 187 and 188:
Public Schools, Montgomery College,
Page 189 and 190:
Significant Cost Containment Action
Page 191 and 192:
MONTGOMERY COLLEGE 2009 ACCOUNTABIL
Page 193 and 194:
MONTGOMERY COLLEGE 2009 ACCOUNTABIL
Page 195 and 196:
communicating the state of the coll
Page 197 and 198:
last year. Specific operational imp
Page 199 and 200:
driver education programs and to th
Page 201 and 202:
cohorts when measured by percentage
Page 203 and 204:
2008 headcount. The improving enrol
Page 205 and 206:
seeking credit students were enroll
Page 207 and 208:
Community Outreach and Impact Princ
Page 209 and 210:
software; Workforce Development and
Page 211 and 212:
14 16 PRINCE GEORGE'S COMMUNITY COL
Page 213 and 214:
PRINCE GEORGE'S COMMUNITY COLLEGE 2
Page 215 and 216:
Occupational Program Associate Degr
Page 217 and 218:
every effort to provide access by k
Page 219 and 220:
As an indication of CSM’s commitm
Page 221 and 222:
The CSM Energetics cohort that was
Page 223 and 224:
Student Characteristics (not Benchm
Page 225 and 226:
COLLEGE OF SOUTHERN MARYLAND 2009 A
Page 227 and 228:
WOR-WIC COMMUNITY COLLEGE MISSION W
Page 229 and 230:
The successful-persister rate for t
Page 231 and 232:
Supporting the State Plan action re
Page 233 and 234:
180. An increase to 129 occurred in
Page 235 and 236:
The college has partnered with the
Page 237 and 238:
13. Used a National Joint Powers Al
Page 239 and 240:
14 WOR-WIC COMMUNITY COLLEGE 2009 A
Page 241 and 242:
WOR-WIC COMMUNITY COLLEGE 2009 ACCO
Page 243 and 244:
BOWIE STATE UNIVERSITY MISSION Bowi
Page 245 and 246:
KEY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMA
Page 247 and 248:
GOAL 4: ENHANCE INCOME FROM EXTERNA
Page 249 and 250:
information is underreported since
Page 251 and 252:
FY 2009 COST CONTAINMENT EFFORTS Fo
Page 253 and 254:
actuals per MSDE) 5 Input Number of
Page 255 and 256:
COPPIN STATE UNIVERSITY MISSION A c
Page 257 and 258:
Progress Made A critical mission of
Page 259 and 260:
Progress Made Coppin’s second-yea
Page 261 and 262:
Performance measures for this goal
Page 263 and 264:
percent less expensive than the sta
Page 265 and 266:
In FY 2008, Coppin’s second-year
Page 267 and 268:
KEY GOALS AND OBJECTIVES Goal 1: Pr
Page 269 and 270:
($000’s) 6,7 Outcome Ratio of med
Page 271 and 272:
Performance Measures Input Total nu
Page 273 and 274:
FROSTBURG STATE UNIVERSITY INSTITUT
Page 275 and 276:
Computer Information Systems, have
Page 277 and 278:
course sections were offered in the
Page 279 and 280:
Goal 5: Increase recognition for th
Page 281 and 282:
Approximately 70% of FSU’s teache
Page 283 and 284:
KEY GOALS AND OBJECTIVES Goal 1: Se
Page 285 and 286:
Objective 4.1: Attain greater facul
Page 287 and 288:
Note: 1 Cumulative number of initia
Page 289 and 290:
Kiplinger’s Personal Finance maga
Page 291 and 292:
Organizations to support a diverse
Page 293 and 294:
By providing additional academic as
Page 295 and 296:
approximately 7,275 applications we
Page 297 and 298:
In the past ten years, the nursing
Page 299 and 300:
Salisbury University continues its
Page 301 and 302:
Goal 2. Utilize strategic collabora
Page 303 and 304:
through 2009. 2006 2007 2008 2009 P
Page 305 and 306:
TOWSON UNIVERSITY MISSION Towson Un
Page 307 and 308:
eligible students. The University c
Page 309 and 310:
With the Community College of Balti
Page 311 and 312:
eleases, saving $11,000, were imple
Page 313 and 314:
It should also be noted that the nu
Page 315 and 316:
KEY GOALS AND OBJECTIVES Goal 1: Cr
Page 317 and 318:
Goal 2: Promote economic developmen
Page 319 and 320:
Objective 4.4 Maintain the level of
Page 321 and 322:
Baltimore does not offer any progra
Page 323 and 324:
FY 2009 Funding Issues and Cost Con
Page 325 and 326:
Objective 2.4 By FY 2009, expand th
Page 327 and 328:
UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND EASTERN SHOR
Page 329 and 330:
2008-2009 academic year, these incl
Page 331 and 332:
enroll at UMES, they matriculate in
Page 333 and 334:
UMES continues to review its GPA re
Page 335 and 336:
Enrollment in Distance Education an
Page 337 and 338:
Summary The University of Maryland
Page 339 and 340:
Objective 3.1 Increase the total nu
Page 341 and 342:
UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND, UNIVERSITY
Page 343 and 344:
MHEC Goal 2: Achieve a system of po
Page 345 and 346:
MHEC Goal 5: Promote economic growt
Page 347 and 348:
MHEC included this comment in last
Page 349 and 350:
Actual Actual Actual Actual Quality
Page 351 and 352:
ST. MARY’S COLLEGE OF MARYLAND MI
Page 353 and 354:
of graduating seniors rating health
Page 355 and 356:
KEY GOALS AND OBJECTIVES Note: Unle
Page 357 and 358:
Objective 2.3 Between 2005 and 2009
Page 359 and 360:
Output Four-year graduation rate at
Page 361 and 362:
Goal 7: Increase access for student
Page 363 and 364:
Outcome Recycling rate for solid wa
Page 365 and 366:
UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND, BALTIMORE M
Page 367 and 368:
through surveys sent to deans, admi
Page 369 and 370:
implemented a 21 st century oral he
Page 371 and 372:
RESPONSE TO ISSUES/QUESTIONS RAISED
Page 373 and 374:
KEY GOALS AND OBJECTIVES Goal 1: Ev
Page 375 and 376:
Objective 3.3 By fiscal year 2010 m
Page 377 and 378:
UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND, BALTIMORE C
Page 379 and 380:
Engineering Society (AES) Conferenc
Page 381 and 382:
vs. 66.3% (see Objectives 4.3 and 5
Page 383 and 384:
1970s are now reaching retirement a
Page 385 and 386:
Total Efficiency Efforts $3,060 UMB
Page 387 and 388: Objective 2.2 Increase the estimate
Page 389 and 390: Objective 5.3 Increase the number o
Page 391 and 392: UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND 2009 Institu
Page 393 and 394: Maryland Transfer Advantage Program
Page 395 and 396: The University’s Strategic Plan a
Page 397 and 398: Local Economic Development. The Uni
Page 399 and 400: Explanation Required Response to Co
Page 401 and 402: decline in teacher enrollment at th
Page 403 and 404: Objective 2.2 Increase the average
Page 405 and 406: Objective 2.13 Increase the six-yea
Page 407 and 408: Objective 5.5 Maintain the percenta
Page 409 and 410: choice for the children, grandchild
Page 411 and 412: places emphasis on attracting and r
Page 413 and 414: financial aid packages that would m
Page 415 and 416: ACCOUNTABILITY GOALS, OBJECTIVES AN
Page 417 and 418: Percent of degrees awarded to Afric
Page 419 and 420: Objective 6.3 Maintain the percenta
Page 421 and 422: MISSION/ MANDATE PERFORMANCE INDICA
Page 423 and 424: QUALITY AND EFFECTIVENESS: STUDENT
Page 425 and 426: 17. Successful-persister rate after
Page 427 and 428: 28. Employer satisfaction with cont
Page 429 and 430: FY 08: Fall 01 cohort FY 09: Fall 0
Page 431 and 432: FY 10: Fall 09 (est) FY 11: Fall 10
Page 433 and 434: Coppin State University MFR 2009 OP
Page 437: Coppin State University MFR 2009 OP
Page 445 and 446: RB26.00 FROSTBURG STATE UNIVERSITY
Page 459 and 460: Template Objective Salisbury Univer
Page 467 and 468: Template Objective SU USM Indicator
Page 469 and 470: TOWSON UNIVERSITY - MFR 2008 OPERAT
Page 483 and 484: 29 2005 Actual: graduates who took
Page 485 and 486: Est: Class of 2010 grads 33 Fiscal
Page 487 and 488: 2005 Survey after graduation by tot
Page 489 and 490:
2.4 Number of students enrolled in
Page 491 and 492:
OUTPUTS 6 FY 09: Cohort of 2007 4.1
Page 493 and 494:
9 FY 09: Cohort of 2002 4.4 Six-yea
Page 495 and 496:
12 FY 09: Fall 08 Actual 2.1 Percen
Page 497 and 498:
16 5.2 Funds received through fundr
Page 499 and 500:
19 FY 08: Fall 06 + Spring 06 (ETS
Page 501 and 502:
EFFICIENCY 22 FY 09: Fiscal Year 08
Page 503 and 504:
June 27, 2008 - UMUC - Common + Ins
Page 505 and 506:
Page 507 and 508:
Page 509 and 510:
OPERATIONAL DEFINITIONS FOR MFR/ACC
Page 511 and 512:
Page 513 and 514:
Page 515 and 516:
Measure # Special Timeframe Issues
Page 517 and 518:
Measure # Special Timeframe Issues
Page 519 and 520:
Page 521 and 522:
9 FY 05: cohort of 2003 4.2 African
Page 523 and 524:
19 FY 05: 2000 survey- 1999 bach de
Page 525 and 526:
4/12/2010 UMBC MFR Operational Defi
Page 527 and 528:
UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PAR
Page 529 and 530:
Page 531 and 532:
Page 533 and 534:
Page 535 and 536:
MORGAN STATE UNIVERSITY OPERATIONAL
Page 537 and 538:
INDICATOR SOURCE OPERATIONAL DEFINI
Page 539 and 540:
SUGGESTED GUIDELINES - BENCHMARKING
Page 541 and 542:
INSTITUTIONAL PERFORMANCE ACCOUNTAB
Page 543 and 544:
5. Cost Containment Significant cos
Page 545:
4. Cost containment Significant cos
show all

2009 Performance Accountability Report Vol. 2 - Maryland Higher ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?